2017 (5) TMI 1732

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... PREMIER LITHO WORKS AND ANOTHER [2009 (7) TMI 1159 - MADRAS HIGH COURT] where it was held that The assessing officer had no evidence before him to come to a conclusion that the labels printed by the first respondent are marketable, though not actually marketed. There was also no evidence on record to show that the printing of labels is not incidental, but primary. Revision dismissed. - TAX C .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the Revenue. The decisions are as follows: (i)The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by the Deputy Commissioner (CT), Tirunelveli Division, Tiruneveli Vs. Tvl. Vibgyor Process (Tax Case Revision No.687 of 2006), dated 05.11.2008; (ii)State of Tamil Nadu Vs. Premier Litho Works and another reported in (2009) 26 VST 205 (Mad); and (iii)The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by Deputy Commissioner (CT), Tiru .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X