TMI Blog2020 (7) TMI 695X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Mukesh Agrawal, Kapil Wadhwa, Piyush Parashar, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. Siddharth Seth, Advocate for the respondent No.1. Mr. G.S. Thakur, Advocate for respondents No.2, 3 and 4. Mr. Swapnil Ganguly, Dy. Advocate General for the respondents/State. Learned counsel for the respondent No.1 states that a copy of the rejoinder was received only last night which is quite voluminous and could ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sh Arora have been arrested in exercise of the power under Section 69 of the GST Act. It was urged that not only there existed no reasons to believe to conduct the search, there is no adjudication regarding the quantum of tax allegedly evaded, made by any of the authorities. According to the learned Senior Counsel, in spite of the aforesaid, the petitioner has deposited an amount of Rs. 8 Crores u ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r the Revenue that no further recovery shall be effected till the demand is raised in accordance with law and that the matter is being kept for 05.08.2020 for further hearing, we direct that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner. The respondents shall remain bound by their statement made today till then. However, it is clarified that the grant of interim protection regarding coe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|