Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2018 (7) TMI 2125

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t of Commerce & Industries], and the Kolkata Municipal Corporation - the objects being to foster the promotion of trade and 'Commerce. For implementation purpose - it is incorporated as a company under section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956, i.e., the objects of the company are to promote the objects of the nature specified in the Section 25 sub-section (1), clause (a) of the said Act, and that it will apply its profits, if any, or other income in promoting its objects and to prohibit the payment of any dividend to its members. In the assessment, the AO assessed the assessee as a company under Chapter IV of the Act - i.e., as a company with profit motive/business income. Though not mentioned in the assessment order, it is obvious that this was because of absence of registration u/s 12AA [for this AY 2011-12]. Thus, while being assessed visà- vis computation under chapter IV, some disallowances were made and thereafter the AO assessed the total income of assessee at Rs. 2,12,13,110/-. Aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) who deleted the addition. Aggrieved, revenue is before us. 4. We have heard rival submissions and gone through the facts and .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s also i.e Asst Years 2003-04 to 2008-09. Though this first proviso to section 12A(2) talks about pendency of assessment proceedings, it is relevant to get into the definition of the term 'assessment' in section 2(8) of the Act, wherein it is defined as "assessment includes reassessment". Hence even reassessment proceedings that were pending would also come under the ambit of the first proviso to section 12A(2) of the Act. 15. The second proviso to section 12A(2) also provides that no action u/s 147 of the Act shall be taken merely for non-registration of trust or institution. Reading this proviso with the first proviso to section 12A(2) and applying the Rule of Harmonious Construction, it could safely be concluded that the legislature in its wisdom had only brought this proviso to prevent genuine hardship that could be caused on the assessee due to non-registration u/s 12AA of the Act and accordingly in our opinion, the provisos to section 12A(2) of the Act is to be construed as retrospective in operation. 16. The third proviso to section 12A(2) of the Act also provides that the first and second proviso shall not be applicable if the trust or institution had been refused regis .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... (No. 2) Act, 2014 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes vide its Circular No. 01 / 2015 dated 21.1.2015. 20. Apparently the statute provides that registration once granted in subsequent year, the benefit of the same has to be applied in the earlier assessment years for which assessment proceedings are pending before the Learned AO, unless the registration granted earlier is cancelled or refused for specific reasons. The statute also goes on to provide that no action u/s 147 could be taken by the AO merely for non-registration of trust for earlier years. 21. With regard to the arguments of the Learned DR that donations received by assessee falls under the definition of income u/s 2(24)(iia) of the Act, we would like to state that income definition is an inclusive definition. An inclusive definition extends the specific meaning given in the stated items by the general meaning as commonly understood by the said expression which is defined in a statute. The word income as is commonly understood does not include any donation specifically meant for utilization for acquiring, constructing a capital asset, as is the case here. Further section 2(24) had undergone amendment by way .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he proviso and Explanation 2 have to be read together as expressing the true intention of section 43B. Explanation 2 has been expressly made retrospective. The first proviso, however, cannot be isolated from Explanation 2 and the main body of section 43B. Without the first proviso, Explanation 2 would not obviate the hardship or the unintended consequences of section 43B. The proviso supplies an obvious omission. But for this proviso the ambit of section 43B become unduly wide bringing within its scope those payments, which were not intended to be prohibited from the category of permissible deductions. In the case of Goodyear India Ltd vs State of Haryana (1991) 188 ITR 402 , this court said that the rule of reasonable construction must be applied while construing a statute. Literal construction should be avoided if it defeats the manifest object and purpose of the Act. As observed by G.P.Singh in his Principles of Statutory Interpretation, 4th Edn., Page 291, "It is well settled that if a statute is curative or merely declaratory of the previous law, retrospective operation is generally intended". In fact the amendment would not serve its object in such a situation, unless i .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... proviso added to section 113 of the Act is not beneficial to the assessee. On the contrary, it is a provision which is onerous to the assessee. Therefore, in a case like this, we have to proceed with the normal rule of presumption against retrospective operation. Thus, the rule against retrospective operation is a fundamental rule of law that no  statute shall be construed to have a retrospective operation unless such a construction appears very clearly in the terms of the Act or arises by necessary and distinct implication. Dogmatically framed, the rule is no more than a presumption, and thus could be displaced by out weighing factors. CIT vs J.H.Gotla reported in (1985) 156 ITR 323 (SC) If the purpose of a particular provision is easily discernible from the whole of the scheme of the Act which in this case, is to counteract the effect of transfer of assets so far as computation of income of the assessee is concerned, then bearing that purpose in mind, we should find out the intention from the language used by the legislature and if strict literal construction leads to an absurd result, i.e., result not intended to be subserved by the object of the legislation found in th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nt for utilization towards charitable objects thereon. Hence we hold that in any case, the donations received by the assessee society cannot be brought to tax in the assessment. 26. We hold that since the only reason for denial of exemption u/s 11 was absence of registration u/s 12AA (which was granted to assessee society on 29.10.2010 with effect from 1.4.2010) for the relevant assessment years and on no other ground, the benefit of change in law as above by Finance Act 2014 should be available and for all the years, the benefit of exemption should be available on the date of registration as all the assessments were pending as shown above. In this connection, it requires mention specifically that all the receipts of the donation were proved on enquiry to have been received from the claimed donors and utilized for the specific purpose (construction of old age home) for which they were received. 27. In conclusion, we hold that the insertion of the proviso to section 12A(2) of the Act has to be construed as retrospective in operation." 5. We note that the assessee before us has got registration from Ld. CIT(E) u/s. 12AA of the Act vide order dated 03.05.2013 w.e.f. 01.04.2012. T .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates