Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2020 (10) TMI 221

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e made by Corporate Debtor which has not been substantiated with any proof. The corporate debtor has not placed on record any document which exhibits the plausible dispute between the parties. There is no merit in the so-called dispute raised by the corporate debtor as mere reply filed by the corporate debtor to the present application, is unable to establish any pre-existing dispute of genuine nature. On the contrary the issuance of various cheques by the corporate debtor belies its story of dispute and confirms the admission of liability. This leaves no doubt that the default has occurred for the payment of the operational debt for which the invoices were raised by the applicant and the so called dispute raised by the corporate debtor .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 007 under the provision of Companies Act, 1956 bearing CIN No. U14200DL2007PTC168592 having its registered office at D-176, Mansarovar Garden, New Delhi-110015. The authorized share capital of the company is ₹ 1,50,00,000/- and the paid up capital of the company is ₹ 1,23,47,710/-. The applicant is engaged in the business of import, processing and supply of wide variety of marbles and stones across India and abroad. 3. The Corporate Debtor is a company limited Liability partnership registered with registrar of companies, Delhi, incorporated on 18.10.2017, under the provisions of Companies Act, 1956 bearing Identification no. LLP IN-AAK-9097 and having total Obligation of Contribution of ₹ 10,000/- with its registered of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... pon the registered office of the corporate debtor on 26.12.2018. 8. Upon receipt of demand notice the corporate debtor sent a reply dated 05.01.2019, the corporate debtor denied the contention of the applicant and stated that the goods supplied by the applicant were of defective and substandard in quality and raised several objections for the same. Further, the corporate debtor stated that items were never supplied on time resulting in delay in project of the corporate debtor. 9. The Applicant filed the present Application under section 9 of IBC, 2016 and served the copy of this application which was duly delivered to the Corporate Debtor as per service affidavit. The Corporate debtor failed to appear before the Tribunal in spite of s .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... pplicant and the so called dispute raised by the corporate debtor is merely a moonshine dispute as laid down In Mobilox Innovative Private Limited vs. Kirusa Software Private Limited , the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that It is clear, therefore that once the Operational creditor has filed an application, which is otherwise complete, the adjudicating authority must reject the application under Section 9(5)(2(d) if notice of dispute has been received by the operational creditor or there is a record of dispute in the information utility. It is clear that such notice must bring to the notice of operational creditor the existence of a dispute or the fact that a suit or arbitration proceeding relating to a dispute is pending between th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... erational debt. Hence, the application is admitted. 17. As a consequence of application being admitted and IRP name not suggested by the applicant, this Bench appoints Mr. Rajesh Kumar Goel, having email id: rajesh.goel@mrgoel.com and registration no. IBBI/IPA-001/IP-P01810/2019-20/12761 as the Interim Resolution Professional, subject to the condition that no disciplinary proceedings are pending against him. The IRP is required to file consent Form-2 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rule 2016 and make disclosures as required under IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulation 2016, within a period of one week from this order. 18. As a consequence of the app .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates