TMI Blog2020 (10) TMI 234X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rt had directed the Commissioner to take a decision one way or the other on the representation of the Petitioner to grant permission for re-export of the goods in question in accordance with law. Instead of taking the necessary decision, Commissioner has deferred taking such decision for an indefinite period. The Commissioner is directed to pass a fresh or consequential order in terms of our ea ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... India, Petitioner seeks quashing of order dated 22.07.2020 passed by the Respondent and for a direction to the Respondent to allow re-export of the goods i.e., clove covered by the bills of Lading dated 25.12.2019 and 21.01.2020. 3] Earlier Petitioner had approached this Court by filing WPASDB- LD-VC-NO.139/2020, which was disposed of vide order dated 03.07.2020 in the following terms :- 1 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ition is filed. We deem it fit to issue direction to respondent No.1 to take decision on the representation of the petitioner dated 19th June 2020, if not already decided. Since respondent No.1 with whom representation is pending is not present, we make it clear that the decision shall be as per law. Decision shall be taken by the respondent No.1 within a period of three weeks after receipt of ord ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ll the report of PQ authorities is received. 9. In view of the above, your request regarding re-export of the subject goods cannot be entertained at this stage till the requirements, as detailed above are fulfilled. Accordingly, your representation dated 19.06.2020 is disposed of. 5] Prima-facie, we are of the view that aforesaid order passed by the Commissioner is not what the High Co ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
