Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2020 (10) TMI 848

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... y the Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods & Service Tax Division-H, Jaipur (hereinafter called as the "adjudicating authority") as  mentioned below. As common issue is involved in all these Two appeals therefore, I take up the same for decision simultaneously: S. No   Appeal No   Order  in Original No & date(lmpugned order)   Period of dispute   Order sanctioning / rejecting refund   1 2 3 4 5 1 APPL/JPR/CG ST/JP/50/XII /2020/ 227/GST/ REFUND/ FINAL/ 2018-19 DATED 07.11.2019 Appellant has filed refund claim under Section 54 of the CGST Act, 2017 of Rs. 20,892/- for the period August to September 2017 in respect of ITC accumulated on account of export of services .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... on the following grounds which may be summarized as under:- * that the rejection of refund application without issue of show cause notice and deficiency memo in GST RFD-03 under CGST Act, 2017 & CGST Rules, 2017 and is against the provision of the GST Law and principle of natural justice. * that the refund rejection order dated 07.11.2019 made by the proper officer of Central Goods and Service Tax, Jaipur is wrong on facts and is bad in law and has been made arbitrarily without considering the facts of the case and the order has been made without any justifiable basis. * that on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the refund application should not reject without giving opportunity of being heard. Thus the order is wrong, u .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... fter rectification of such deficiencies. 8.  Further, as per first proviso to sub rule (3) of Rule 92 of CGST Rule,2017- Where the proper officer is satisfied, for reasons to be recorded in writing, that the whole or any part of the amount claimed as refund is not admissible or is not payable to the applicant, he shall issue a notice in FORM GST RFD-08 to the applicant, requiring him to furnish a reply in FORM GST RFD-09 within a period of fifteen days of the receipt of such notice and after considering the reply, make an order in FORM GST RFD-06 sanctioning the amount of refund in whole or part, or rejecting the said refund claim and the said order shall be made available to the applicant electronically and the provisions of sub-rule .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates