TMI Blog2019 (9) TMI 1416X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... for filing the return of income in the case under section 139(4) was 31.03.2014 as against 31.03.2013 mentioned in the order of Tribunal - HELD THAT:- The Tribunal [ 2019 (1) TMI 875 - ITAT PUNE] had decided the present appeals following the case of Humayun Suleman Merchant Vs. CCIT [ 2016 (9) TMI 70 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] . The appeals of applicants were decided ex-parte in view of the issue bein ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ve been filed by different applicants against consolidated order of Tribunal dated 31.12.2018. 2. The present Miscellaneous Applications are moved in bunch of appeals by different applicants on the ground that no notice of hearing was received by assessee and the applicants are aggrieved by the ex-parte order passed in the case. 3. The plea of learned Authorized Representative for the applic ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Humayun Suleman Merchant Vs. CCIT (2016) 73 taxmann.com 2 (Bom.). The appeals of applicants were decided ex-parte in view of the issue being decided by the Hon ble Bombay High Court (supra). In such facts and circumstances, I find merit in the plea of applicants and the order of Tribunal is recalled for regular hearing. The Registry is directed to fix the appeals in regular course and issue notic ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
