TMI Blog2020 (11) TMI 497X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... uld not preclude the right of the Petitioner to raise same contentions in W.P. Nos.30376 and 30377 of 2016 before this Court. - W.P. Nos. 5111, 5112 and 9534 of 2014 And M.P. Nos. 1, 1 and 2 of 2014 - - - Dated:- 8-10-2020 - Mr. Justice P.D. Audikesavalu For the Petitioner : Mr. N.Muralikumaran for M/s. Mcgan Law Firm (in all WPs) For the Respondents : Mrs. Hema Muralikrishnan Stand ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he Respondent calling upon the Petitioner to explain as to why penalty should not be imposed under Sections 112(a) and 114(AA) of the Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short) is challenged in W.P. No. 9534 of 2014 by that partnership firm. 3. It is brought to notice that the after the filing of the Writ Petitions, the Respondent has taken a final decision in th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
