TMI Blog1935 (11) TMI 29X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n on May 25, 1933, duly signed and verified by themselves, that a notice under O. XXI, r. 22, Code of Civil Procedure, was served upon the judgment-debtor and thereafter, on September 14, 1933, a further notice was served upon the judgment-debtor to show cause why certain debts due to him should not be attached. Then the judgment-debtor appeared and argued that the decree-holders' case was bar ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the face of it, there is nothing wrong in that petition and the record shows that it was duly accepted by the Court and the Court proceeded to act upon it. The Court issued notices under O. XXI, r. 22, Code of Civil Procedure, and again issued a further notice why certain property should not be attached. The only defect in the matter was that the pleader acting for the parties had omitted to file ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
