TMI Blog2020 (12) TMI 636X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t of India in ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHANDAN NAGAR VERSUS DUNLOP INDIA LIMITED AND OTHER [ 1984 (11) TMI 63 - SUPREME COURT] has succinctly explained the legal position relating to the exercise of discretionary powers under writ jurisdiction holding that It is only where statutory remedies are entirely ill-suited to meet the demands of extraordinary situations as for instance whe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... upon disputed questions of fact for effectual and complete adjudication of the matter. Petition dismissed. - W.P. No. 28045 of 2015 - - - Dated:- 11-12-2020 - Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.D. Audikesavalu For the Petitioner : Mr. S.Murugappan For the Respondent : Mr. A.P.Srinivas, Standing Counsel ORDER Heard Mr. S.Murugappan, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. A.P.Sr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Authority, but has instead filed this Writ Petition on 04.09.2015 challenging the order passed by the Respondent. 3. It must, at once, be emphasized that the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Assistant Collector of Central Excise -vs- Dunlop India Limited [(1985) 1 SCC 260] has succinctly explained the legal position relating to the exercise of discretionary powers under writ jurisdict ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Article 226 of the Constitution are filed solely for the purpose of obtaining interim orders and thereafter prolong the proceedings by one device or the other. The practice certainly needs to be strongly discouraged. There is no acceptable explanation from the Petitioner for not having resorted to that alternative remedy provided under the statute. It is also not the case of the Petitioner th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
