TMI Blog2017 (11) TMI 1943X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nsidered view that the plea of the learned counsel indeed merits acceptance. We, therefore, deem it fit and proper to remit the issue to the file of the Assessing Officer for adjudication de novo in the light of observations above and the legal position set out in Dharamshibhai Sonani (supra) . Thus we remit the matter to the file of the Assessing Officer in this case as well. Assessee appeal is allowed for statistical purposes. - I.T.A. No. 3354/Ahd/2014 - - - Dated:- 30-11-2017 - Pramod Kumar AM and Mahavir Prasad JM SN Soparkar for the appellant Jayant Jhaveri for the respondent ORDER Per Pramod Kumar, AM: 1. By way of this appeal, the assessee appellant has challenged correctness of the order dated 14th October 2014 passed by the CIT(A)-XVI, Ahmedabad in the matter of assessment under section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2009-10 2. Grievances raised by the assessee are as follows:- (1) Order u/s.250 Dt. 14. 10. 2014 being erroneous, without considering facts on record properly and against the principles of justice be cancelled and set aside. (2) Long Term Capital Gain considered ₹ 41,78,564/ ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... i vs. ACIT (ITA No.1237/Ahd/2013; order dated 30.09.2016) which, inter alia, observes as follows:- [4] The fundamental purpose of introducing section 50C was to counter suppression of sale consideration on sale of immovable properties, and this section was introduced in the light of widespread belief that sale transactions of land and building are often undervalued resulting in leakage of legitimate tax revenues. This Section provides for a presumption, a rebuttable presumption though-something with which I am not concerned for the time being, that the value, for the purpose of computing stamp duty, adopted by the stamp duty valuation authority represents fair indication of the market price of the property sold. Section 50C(1) provides that, Where the consideration received or accruing as a result of the transfer by an assessee of a capital asset, being land or building or both, is less than the value adopted or assessed or assessable by any authority of a State Government (hereafter in this section referred to as the stamp valuation authority ) for the purpose of payment of stamp duty in respect of such transfer, the value so adopted or assessed or assessable shall, for t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the value so adopted or assessed or assessable shall be deemed to be the full value of the consideration, and capital gains shall be computed on the basis of such consideration under section 48 of the Income-tax Act. The scope of section 50C was extended w.e.f. A.Y. 2010-11 to the transaction which were executed through agreement to sell or power of attorney by inserting the word assessable alongwith words the value so adopted or assessed . Hence, section 50C is now also applicable in case of such transfers. The present provisions of section 50C do not provide any relief where the seller has entered into an agreement to sell the asset much before the actual date of transfer of the immovable property and the sale consideration has been fixed in such agreement. A later similar provision inserted by way of section 43CA does take care of such a situation. 6.2 It is therefore proposed to insert the following provisions in section 50C: (4) Where the date of an agreement fixing the value of consideration for the transfer of the asset and the date of registration of the transfer of the asset are not same, the value referred to in sub- section (1) may be taken as the v ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... where the seller has entered into an agreement to sell the property much before the actual date of transfer of the immovable property and the sale consideration is fixed in such agreement, whereas similar provision exists in section 43CA of the Act i.e. when an immovable property is sold as a stock-intrade. It is proposed to amend the provisions of section 50C so as to provide that where the date of the agreement fixing the amount of consideration for the transfer of immovable property and the date of registration are not the same, the stamp duty value on the date of the agreement may be taken for the purposes of computing the full value of consideration. It is further proposed to provide that this provision shall apply only in a case where the amount of consideration referred to therein, or a part thereof, has been paid by way of an account payee cheque or account payee bank draft or use of electronic clearing system through a bank account, on or before the date of the agreement for the transfer of such immovable property. 30 These amendments are proposed to be made effective from the 1st day of April, 2017 and shall accordingly apply in relation to assessment year 2017-18 and su ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... provision, and thus obviate the unintended hardships, such an amendment in law, in view of the well settled legal position to the effect that a curative amendment to avoid unintended consequences is to be treated as retrospective in nature even though it may not state so specifically, the insertion of second proviso must be given retrospective effect from the point of time when the related legal provision was introduced. In view of these discussions, as also for the detailed reasons set out earlier, we cannot subscribe to the view that it could have been an intended consequence to punish the assessees for non-deduction of tax at source by declining the deduction in respect of related payments, even when the corresponding income is duly brought to tax. That will be going much beyond the obvious intention of the section. Accordingly, we hold that the insertion of second proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) is declaratory and curative in nature and it has retrospective effect from 1st April, 2005, being the date from which sub clause (ia) of section 40(a) was inserted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 [8] Their Lordships were pleased to hold that this reasoning and rationale of this ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y the assessee which was on account of sales-tax collected by the assessee for the last quarter of the relevant accounting year. The deduction was disallowed under s. 43B which, as stated above, was inserted w.e.f. 1st April, 1984. It is also relevant to note that the first proviso which came into force w.e.f. 1st April, 1988 was not on the statute book when the assessments were made in the case of Allied Motors (P) Ltd. Etc. (supra). However, the assessee contended that even though the first proviso came to be inserted w.e.f. 1st April, 1988, it was entitled to the benefit of that proviso because it operated retrospectively from 1st April, 1984, when s. 43B stood inserted. This is how the question of retrospectivity arose in Allied Motors (P) Ltd. Etc. (supra). This Court, in Allied Motors (P) Ltd. Etc. (supra) held that when a proviso is inserted to remedy unintended consequences and to make the section workable, a proviso which supplies an obvious omission in the section and which proviso is required to be read into the section to give the section a reasonable interpretation, it could be read retrospective in operation, particularly to give effect to the section as a whole. Acco ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... to Section 50C being retrospective in effect is concerned, there is no doubt about the legal position. I hold the provisos to Section 50C being effective from 1st April 2003. This is precisely what the learned counsel has prayed for. In his detailed written submissions, he has made out of a strong case for the amendment to Section 50C being treated as retrospective and with effect from 1st April 2003. The plea of the assessee is indeed well taken and deserves acceptance. What follows is this. The matter will now go back to the Assessing Officer. In case he finds that a registered agreement to sell, as claimed by the assessee, was actually executed on 29.6.2005 and the partial sale consideration was received through banking channels, the Assessing Officer, so far as computation of capital gains is concerned, will adopt stamp duty valuation, as on 29.6.2005, of the property sold as it existed at that point of time. In case the assessee is not content with this value being adopted under section 50C, he will be at liberty to seek the matter being referred to the DVO for valuation, again as on 29.6.2005, of the said property. As a corollary thereto, the subsequent developments in respe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... value adopted or assessed or assessable by the stamp valuation authority on the date of agreement may be taken for the purposes of computing full value of consideration for such transfer , is retrospective in effect and applies from 1st April 2003. The detailed reasons for coming to this conclusion are already set out in the extract from the Tribunal s decision quoted earlier in this order. 7. In view of these discussions and bearing in mind entirety of the case, we are of the considered view that the plea of the learned counsel indeed merits acceptance. We, therefore, deem it fit and proper to remit the issue to the file of the Assessing Officer for adjudication de novo in the light of observations above and the legal position set out in Dharamshibhai Sonani (supra). Ordered, accordingly. 4. We see no reasons to take any other view of the matter than the view so taken by us as above. Our observations as above will apply mutatis mutandis in this case as well. Respectfully following our views as above, we remit the matter to the file of the Assessing Officer in this case as well. 5. In the result, appeal is allowed for statistical purposes. Pronounced in the open C ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
