TMI Blog2021 (4) TMI 824X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... evant materials furnished by the petitioner were not taken note of before passing the impugned order on 30.12.2020. Therefore, the adjudicating authority has to necessarily revisit the issue by taking note of all the particulars and the materials furnished by the petitioner on 30.12.2020. Of-course, the adjudicating authority will take note of the earlier reply submitted by the petitioner herein. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... an For Respondent : Mr.S.Gurumoorthy And Mr.G.Vidhya Maheswaran ORDER Heard the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent. 2.The petitioner is engaged in manufacture of cements and is falling within the jurisdiction of the first respondent. The case on hand relates to liability of the petitioner for the period ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... titioner to furnish the details sought for. It is seen that on the very next day ie., 30.12.2020, the petitioner submitted all the relevant details to the jurisdictional Range officer. It appears that even before receiving the petitioner's reply, the range officer informed the adjudicating authority vide e-mail dated 30.12.2020 that the noticee had not produced the called for documents for ver ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... . It was in such a background, the impugned order came to be passed. 5.I am satisfied that there was absolutely no delay on the part of the petitioner. On the other hand, the relevant materials furnished by the petitioner were not taken note of before passing the impugned order on 30.12.2020. Therefore, the adjudicating authority has to necessarily revisit the issue by taking note of all the pa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
