TMI Blog2020 (10) TMI 1241X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nt - HELD THAT:- There is no acceptable explanation from the Petitioner for not having resorted to that alternative remedy provided under the statute. In this context, it has to be recapitulated here that the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHANDAN NAGAR VERSUS DUNLOP INDIA LIMITED AND OTHER [ 1984 (11) TMI 63 - SUPREME COURT] has succinctly explained ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... o. 12979 of 2016 - - - Dated:- 15-10-2020 - MR. P.D. AUDIKESAVALU, J. For Petitioner : Mr. Adithya Reddy For Respondent : Mr. A.N.R. Jayaprathap Government Advocate ORDER Heard Mr. Adithya Reddy, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. A.N.R.Jayaprathap, Learned Government Advocate (Taxes) for the Respondent and perused the materials placed on record, apart from the plead ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t has instead filed this Writ Petition on 18.04.2016 challenging the order passed by the Respondent. 3. There is no acceptable explanation from the Petitioner for not having resorted to that alternative remedy provided under the statute. In this context, it has to be recapitulated here that the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Assistant Collector of Central Excise -vs- Dunlop India Limited ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... able are not such matters. We can also take judicial notice of the fact that the vast majority of the petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution are filed solely for the purpose of obtaining interim orders and thereafter prolong the proceedings by one device or the other. The practice certainly needs to be strongly discouraged. Having regard to that legal position, this Court does not ex ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
