TMI Blog2021 (5) TMI 208X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO). We observe in this backdrop of the facts as to how the assessee could not be taken as an aggrieved party once the impugned adjustment is based on its own computation submitted during the course of assessment. Coupled with this, this tribunals decision in Bechtel India Pvt. Ltd.[ 2017 (5) TMI 965 - ITAT DELHI] holds that such interest on delayed realisation on receivables is an international transaction in itself. We therefore find no reason to interfere with the impugned ALP adjustment in issue. The assessee's former six substantive grounds to this effect are declined. Addition on account of mismatching of tax credit as per form 26AS viz-a-viz its books of accounts - assessee's case is that t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ile perused. 2. The assessee has pleaded the following substantive grounds in the instant appeal: 1. The learned Assessing Officer (AO)/Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) are erroneous in law and on the facts of the case. 2. The Ld. AO/DRP is not legally justified in making an adjustment of interest @12% amounting to ₹ 1,69,22,957/- as arm's length price on receivables from Gulf Batter Co. Ltd. after allowing 60 days credit period and from HBL America Income. HBL Germany GmBH after allowing 180 days credit period. 3. The Ld. AO/DRP ought to have appreciated that the receivables arise in the course of business and are not to be treated as loans for levy of interest. 4. The Ld. AO/TPO have erred by treating rece ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nt of ₹ 1,69,22,957/- @12% qua receivables from Associated Enterprises (AEs), M/s. Gulf Batter Company Ltd., after allowing 60 days credit period and M/s. HBL America Inc. and HBL Germany, GmBH after allowing 180 days credit period; respectively. 4. Learned authorised representative vehemently submitted during the course of hearing that the learned lower authorities have erred in law and on facts in making impugned ALP adjustment @12% interest rate without benchmarking it with the corresponding comparables and also that such receivables do not form an international transactions within the meaning of Section 92B of the Act. The Revenue, on the other hand, strongly supported the impugned ALP adjustment. It quoted Section 92B Expla ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e as so determined by the Transfer Pricing Officer . Therefore an amount of ₹ 2,08,01,135/- is added to the total income of the assessee u/s. 92CA of IT Act. Addition: ₹ 2,08,01,135/- 5.2 Aggrieved to the above order, the assessee filed an objection before the Hon'ble Dispute Resolution Panel, Bangalore. The Hon'ble DRP vide order in F. No. 85/DRP-BNG/2016-17 dated 31-10-2016 directed the AO as under: However, with regard to the objection of the assessee regarding the rate of interest of 14.75% charged by the TPO is concerned, we are of the view, that the same can be equivalent to the average cost of the borrowed funds. This can be done only if the assessee produces the finance cost details. The redu ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... is restricted to ₹ 1,69,22,957/- adhering the directions of the DRP. Addition of ₹ 1,69,22,957/- It is sufficiently clear from a perusal of the assessment findings that the impugned ALP adjustment is based on the assessee's details produced in its letter dt. 23-11-2016 containing as well request to adopt the impugned interest rate @12% than 14.75% taken by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO). We observe in this backdrop of the facts as to how the assessee could not be taken as an aggrieved party once the impugned adjustment is based on its own computation submitted during the course of assessment. 5.1. Coupled with this, this tribunals decision in (2017) 85 taxmann.com 121 (Delhi-Trib) Bechtel India Pvt. Ltd. hol ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
