Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2019 (6) TMI 1615

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hom the goods were seized. The first question is whether there was reasonable belief. In this case, it is found that the seizure was based on the information that they had received and that the documents pertaining to the gold, were not found in shop at the time of seizure. There is nothing on record to suggest that the pieces which were seized had any foreign markings. Under these circumstances, there was no reasonable belief for the seizure. The appellant had produced various documents to show how he came in the possession of gold and these documents, on investigation, were found to be genuine. It is for this reason that the Ld.Commissioner has refrained from imposing any penalty upon the appellant under Section 114AA of the Customs A .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... as being transacted at M/s Shree Ganesh Refinery, 7, Kannulal Lane, Kolkata and searched the premises in the presence of the appellant and two independent witnesses. The appellant is the owner of the shop premises, which was searched. During search, 9 ( nine) cut pieces of yellow metal believed to be gold of foreign origin weighing 1718 grams and Indian Currency amounting to ₹ 18,00,000/- were seized. It was believed that the gold was of foreign origin and the Indian Currency was the sale proceeds of smuggled gold. Statement of the appellant was recorded on 03.07.2014, in which, he said that the receipts of the gold from various customers were converted into 22 Carat as replacement. He also said that he would sell the gold and m .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 2 of the Customs Act, 1962. He refrained from imposing any penalty under Section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962, holding that he could not find any conclusive evidence put forward by the investigation to hold that the documents furnished by the appellant during investigation were false or fabricated. On the question of discharging his onus under Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962, he recorded as follows : Shri Madhukar Sonaba Bhagat has tried to discharge his onus in respect of Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962 by submitting claim petition along with the purchase bills of M/s Vickey Jewellery Works Pvt. Ltd. M/s Vickey Jewel Creation Pvt. Ltd. which when verified during investigation was found to be genuine. Furthermore, the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ection 121 also does not sustain. 6. He would further argue that although the gold was seized without reasonable belief, the appellant has discharged his onus by producing various documents and giving details of his transactions with various other Companies. In the impugned order, the Ld.Commissioner, himself, confirms that there is no evidence that any of these documents were fabricated. He further draws attention to the Bench to the fact that the Department searched the premises of various customers and had found nothing incriminating as has been recorded in the Order-in-Original itself. Therefore, nothing survives in this case. There is no evidence that the documents produced by the appellants were false or fabricated. During in .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... while it was being smuggled either at the Port or at the Airport. It was seized from his shop in the City. In such cases, Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962, provides in respect of the gold and some other notified goods, if the seizure was under reasonable belief, that they are smuggled, the onus of proving that they are not rests upon the person from whom the goods were seized. The first question is whether there was reasonable belief. In this case, we find that the seizure was based on the information that they had received and that the documents pertaining to the gold, were not found in shop at the time of seizure. There is nothing on record to suggest that the pieces which were seized had any foreign markings. Under these circum .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates