TMI Blog1986 (12) TMI 13X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the order of the Tribunal dated October 30, 1982. According to the applicant, the order dated October 30, 1982, is an order passed by the Tribunal without jurisdiction. In this view of the matter, it does not appear that these applications for reference are at all maintainable. All these applications raise an identical question, and to appreciate the issue raised, the relevant facts pertaining to ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hearing. Counsel for the assessee states that against the order of the Tribunal disposing of the appeal subsequently, a reference has already been made by the Tribunal under section 27 of the Wealth-Act and is pending in this court. By the present wealth-tax cases, the Commissioner of Wealth-tax seeks to challenge the jurisdiction of the Tribunal to pass the order dated October 30, 1982. The sub ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the notice of the Tribunal that valid service had not been effected on her and the Tribunal came to realise that the appellant had not been served, it was entitled to rectify under section 35(1)(d) of the Wealth-tax Act and pass appropriate orders for amending the position. In this view of the matter, the order passed by the Tribunal on October 30, 1982, is so obviously correct that no arguable q ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
