Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2018 (11) TMI 1850

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sessee makes a claim after furnishing entire details, it is his personal opinion with regard to income-tax. There may be difference of opinion with regard to nature of transactions by the assessee at one end and opinion of Department at other end. This difference of opinion with regard to nature of transaction cannot be construed as furnishing inaccurate particulars of income as found by the Apex Court in Reliance Petroproducts (P) Ltd. (supra). - penalty levied by the assessee for both the assessment years are deleted. - Decided in favour of assessee. - ITA Nos. 388 & 389/Chny/2018 - - - Dated:- 16-11-2018 - Shri N.R.S. Ganesan, Judicial Member And Shri A. Mohan Alankamony, Accountant Member For the Appellant : Shri C. Subramanian .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hing inaccurate particulars or concealing any part of income. Therefore, according to the Ld. representative, the CIT(Appeals) is not justified in confirming the orders of the Assessing Officer. 3. On the contrary, Shri Guru Bashyam, the Ld. Departmental Representative, submitted that the assessee is engaged in speculative business in trading in futures and options through broker M/s Shreyas Stock Pvt. Ltd. According to the Ld. D.R., the assessee deliberately filed the return of income claiming set off of losses suffered in share trading against income from other source, therefore, the assessee has furnished inaccurate particulars of income. Since the assessee has furnished inaccurate particulars of income with regard to nature of share .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) has concealed the particulars of his income or furnished inaccurate particulars of such income, or he may direct that such person shall pay by way of penalty,-- (ii) in the cases referred to in clause (b), in addition to tax, if any, payable by him, a sum of ten thousand rupees for each such failure ; (iii) in the cases referred to in clause (c) or clause (d), in addition to tax, if any, payable by him, a sum which shall not be less than, but which shall not exceed 1three times, the amount of tax sought to be evaded by reason of the concealment of particulars of his 4income or fringe benefits or the furnishing of inaccurate particulars of such income or fringe benefits. 6. The Assess .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates