TMI Blog2021 (7) TMI 386X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s ensuring that interest of complainant is upheld in the interim period before the charges are proven against the drawer. The intent behind this provision is to provide aid to the complainant during the pendency of proceedings under Section 138 of the Act, where he is already suffering doubleedged sword of loss of receivables by dishonor of the cheque and the subsequent legal costs in pursuing claim and offence. These amendments would reduce pendency in courts because of the deterrent effect on the masses along ensuring certainty of process that was very much lacking in the past, especially enforced at key stages of the proceedings under the Act. From perusal of the amended provision of Section 143A of the Act, 1881, it is clear that the word 'may' used is beneficial for the complainant because the complainant has already suffered for mass deed committed by the accused by not paying the amount, therefore, it is in the interest of the complainant as well the accused if the 20% of the cheque amount is to be paid by the accused, he may be able to utilize the same for his own purpose, whereas the accused will be in safer side as the amount is already deposited in pursuance o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... inant/ respondent has filed complaint against the petitioner under Section 138 of the Act, 1881 on 09.01.2019 before Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) mainly contending that the petitioner had given a cheque dated 26.11.2018 amounting to ₹ 6,50,000/- to the complainant. The complainant has deposited the cheque on 28.11.2018 in the account maintained by him in Central Bank of India, Branch- Chhattisgarh College, Raipur. The said cheque was dishonoured and returned due to insufficient fund on 14.12.2018, therefore, the offence under Section 138 of the Act, 1881 has been committed by the petitioner. 3. The complainant has sent a legal notice to the petitioner on 17.12.2018 as petitioner has not paid the amount of cheque, therefore, the complainant has filed a Complaint Case No. 1777/2019 before Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur, The learned Judicial Magistrate First Class taking cognizance on the complaint, issued summon to the petitioner. On 04.05.2019, the complainant has filed an application under Section 143A of the Act, 1881 contending that the charges have already been framed wherein he has denied the charges levelled against him. Fu ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e date of the order under sub-section (1), or within such further period not exceeding thirty days as may be directed by the Court on sufficient cause being shown by the drawer of the cheque. (4) If the drawer of the cheque is acquitted, the Court shall direct the complainant to repay to the drawer the amount of interim compensation, with interest at the bank rate as published by the Reserve Bank of India, prevalent at the beginning of the relevant financial years, within sixty days from the date of the order, or within such further period not exceeding thirty days as may be directed by the Court on sufficient cause being shown by the complainant. (5) The interim compensation payable under this section may be recovered as if it were a find under section 421 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974). (6) The amount of fine imposed under section 138 or the amount of compensation awarded under section 357 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974). 7. Learned counsel for the petitioner would rely upon the judgment of Madras High Court in L.G.R. Enterprises another Vs. P. Anbazhagan AIR Online 2019 Mad 801, and drew attention of this Court t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tions. 2. It is proposed to amend the said Act with a view to address the issue of undue delay in final resolution of cheque dishonour cases so as to provide relief to payees of dishonoured cheques and to discourage frivolous and unnecessary litigation which would save time and money. The proposed amendments will strengthen the credibility of cheques and help trade and commerce in general by allowing lending institutions, including banks, to continue to extend financing to the productive sectors of the economy. 10. From perusal of the Act, 1881 as well as amended Section 143A of the Act, 1881, it is clear that the Act, 1881 has played a substantial role in the Indian commercial landscape and has given rightful sanction against defaulters of the due process of trade who engage in disingenuous activities that causes unlawful losses to rightful recipients through cheque dishonour. Thereafter, the legislature has amended Act, 1881, which came into force on 01.09.2018 with the aim to secure the interest of the complainant along with increasing the efficacy and expediency of proceedings under Section 138 of the Act, 1881. Section 143A of the Act, 1881 stipulates that under cert ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t of directory in nature. 13. The Hon'ble Supreme Court, while examining 'may' used 'shall' and have effect of directory in nature in case of Bachahan Devi another Vs. Nagar Nigam, Gorakhpur another (2008) 12 SCC 372, which reads as under:- 18. It is well-settled that the use of word may in a statutory provision would not by itself show that the provision is directory in nature. In some cases, the legislature may use the word 'may' as a matter of pure conventional courtesy and yet intend a mandatory force. In order, therefore, to interpret the legal import of the word may , the court has to consider various factors, namely, the object and the scheme of the Act, the context and the background against which the words have been used, the purpose and the advantages sought to be achieved by the use of this word, and the like. It is equally well-settled that where the word 'may' involves a discretion coupled with an obligation or where it confers a positive benefit to a general class of subjects in a utility Act, or where the court advances a remedy and suppresses the mischief, or where giving the words directory significance would d ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rbs like may and shall is to discover the legislative intent; and the use of words `may' and 'shall' is not decisive of its discretion or mandates. The use of the words may and `shall' may help the courts in ascertaining the legislative intent without giving to either a controlling or a determinating effect. The courts have further to consider the subject matter, the purpose of the provisions, the object intended to be secured by the statute which is of prime importance, as also the actual words employed. 14. The Supreme Court in Surinder Singh Deswal alias Colonel S.S. Deswal others Vs. Virender Gandhi (2019) 11 SCC 341, has examined provision of Section 148 of the Act, 1881 and held that it is mandatory provision. The relevant para of the judgment is reproduced below:- 8. Now so far as the submission on behalf of the Appellants that even considering the language used in Section 148 of the N.I. Act as amended, the appellate Court may order the Appellant to deposit such sum which shall be a minimum of 20% of the fine or compensation awarded by the trial Court and the word used is not shall and therefore the discretion is vested with the firs ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , the Parliament has thought it fit to amend Section 148 of the N.I. Act. Therefore, such a purposive interpretation would be in furtherance of the Objects and Reasons of the amendment in Section 148 of the N.I. Act and also Section 138 of the N.I. Act. 15. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in G.J. Raja Vs. Tejraj Surana (2019) 19 SCC 469, has examined the amended Section 143A of the Act, 1881 and held that it is prospective effect and not retrospective effect. The relevant para of the judgment is reproduced below:- 19. It must be stated that prior to the insertion of Section 143-A in the Act there was no provision on the statute book whereunder even before the pronouncement of the guilt of an accused, or even before his conviction for the offence in question, he could be made to pay or deposit interim compensation. The imposition and consequential recovery of fine or compensation either through the modality of Section 421 of the Code or Section 357 of the code could also arise only after the person was found guilty of an offence. That was the status of law which was sought to be changed by the introduction of Section 143A in the Act. It now imposes a liability that even ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... a recall non-bailable warrant petition after a long time and the Court while considering his petition for recalling the nonbailable warrant can invoke Section 143A(1) of the Act. This list is not exhaustive and it is more illustrative as to the various circumstances under which the trial Court will be justified in exercising its jurisdiction under Section 143A(1) of the Act, by directing the accused person to pay the interim compensation of 20% to the complainant. 9. The other reason why the order of the trial Court under Section 143A(1) of the Act, should contain reasons, is because it will always be subjected to challenge before this Court. This Court while considering the petition will only look for the reasons given by the Court below while passing the order under Section 143A(1) of the Act. An order that is subjected to appeal or revision, should always be supported by reasons. A discretionary order without reasons is, on the face of it, illegal and it will be setaside on that ground alone. 18. The judgment cited by learned counsel for the petitioner also indicates that the Judicial Magistrate First Class has to pass a reasoned order for determining quantum of compen ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
