TMI Blog2019 (8) TMI 1728X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ner of Income Tax (Appeals) to decide his jurisdiction in accordance with law. Therefore it would be appropriate that the petitioner files an appeal to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) within a period of three weeks from today. On petitioners filing an appeal, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) shall, within a further period of three weeks from the date of filing, decide the issu ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... allenged the action of the Assessing Officer in raising a tax demand of a sum of ₹ 5,872.13 Crores (rounded of) and further directing the Petitioner to pay up such amount forthwith, without allowing the Petitioner any time for either challenging it before the appropriate authority or in any other manner allowing the Petitioner to pursue its remedies. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submit ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... /04/2019. 2. The Petitioner has invoked extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court challenging the impugned order dated 14 March 2019 passed by Respondent No.1 under section 115Q read with 115O of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act). The Petitioner has averred that there is no efficacious alternate remedy of statutory appeal available under the Act. This as the impugned order dated 14 March 2019 as ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... issioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to decide his jurisdiction in accordance with law. Therefore it would be appropriate that the petitioner files an appeal to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) within a period of three weeks from today. On petitioners filing an appeal, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) shall, within a further period of three weeks from the date of filing, decide the is ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
