2021 (7) TMI 998

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... R UTKARSH SHARMA, AGP FOR THE RESPONDENT ORDER PER : HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI 1. Heard, the learned advocates for the parties for some time. Learned advocate Mr. Hardik Vora for the petitioner has relied upon the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of M/s. Radha Krishan Industries vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and Others, AIR 2021 SC 2114 and submitted that the petitioner .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 83 would have a wide repercussion and therefore, some time may be given to verify the position as to whether the said new provisions have come into force or not. 2. In view of the above, put up on 30th July 2021. 2.1 However, considering the affidavit-in-reply filed by the respondent to the effect that the petitioner firm is liable to pay the tax with interest and penalty, in aggregate Rs. 1,09, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... g into the merits of the other issues involved in the petition, at present, the provisional attachment in respect of the bank account No. 369801010029171 (Current Account) of the Union Bank of India and the bank account No. 3809201000037 (Current Account) of the Canara Bank is removed. The provisional attachment in respect of the two immovable properties shall continue.
Case laws, Decisions, J .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X