TMI Blog2018 (4) TMI 1889X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ty of the petitioner to tax in respect of set-top-boxes - HELD THAT:- Since the petitioner is on first appeal, he would have paid at least 12.5% of the disputed tax. But according to the petitioner an adjustment of the ITC was made, leading to a total payment of nearly 24% of the disputed tax - In matters of similar nature, this Court granted stay on condition that 25% of the disputed tax is paid ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. S. Suri Babu, learned Special Standing Counsel takes notice for the respondents. 3. The matter relates to the liability of the petitioner to tax in respect of set-top-boxes. Since the petitioner is on first appeal, he would have paid at least 12.5% of the disputed tax. But according to the petitioner an adjustment of the ITC was made, leading to a total paym ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
