TMI Blog2021 (10) TMI 600X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ms to have been passed against the petitioner, which is starring at the petitioner and the same has to be challenged in the manner known to law. In order to enable the petitioner to challenge those orders, this Court feels that those orders along with the connected materials shall be furnished to the learned Counsel for the petitioner and on receipt of the same, it is open to the petitioner to cha ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 020 dated 23.08.2021, passed by the second respondent herein and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to repay the amount of ₹ 83,169/- recovered from the Petitioner's Account No.0387073000000109 in the third respondent bank and also to defreeze the above said account. 2. The impugned orders in this writ petition are pursuant to the order-in-original passed ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hallenging the order-in-original, cannot challenge the consequential orders. However, the learned Counsel for the petitioner stick on to his stand that none of these proceedings or orders as referred to by the Customs have ever been served on the petitioner. 5. Be that as it may, an order dated 24.08.2020, seems to have been passed against the petitioner, which is starring at the petitioner a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... itioner through the learned Counsel for the petitioner, within two weeks and on receipt of the same, it is open to the petitioner to challenge the said order, if he is advised to do so. Depending upon the outcome of the challenge against the order dated 24.08.2020, the present impugned orders can also be put under challenge. 6. With these directions, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. Ho ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
