2016 (12) TMI 1871

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ent : Shri Yogesh Agarwal, A.R. Per Justice (Dr.) Satish Chandra: The present appeal is filed against order in original no. 15/2011 dated 19. 01.2011 passed by the Commissioner (A) Jaipur. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant is engaged in clearing yarn from its factory to depots on provisional assessment basis. The period of dispute in the present appeal is January 1998 to Au .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n 19.01.2011, where the claim of the appellant was rejected. Not being satisfied, the appellant has filed the present appeal. 7. With this background we have heard Shri Rahul Tangri, Ld. Counsel for the appellant and Shri Yogesh Agarwal, A.R. for the respondent. 8. After hearing both the parties and on perusal of record, it appears from the impugned order that there is no provision of issuance o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X