TMI Blog2021 (11) TMI 557X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... RAM VERSUS DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT [ 2019 (9) TMI 286 - SUPREME COURT] , but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, it is not considered to be a fit case to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The anticipatory bail application filed by the petitioner is dismissed. - S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16124/2021 - - - Dated:- 11-11-2021 - Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Singh Dhaddha For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Adv., Mr. Aniket Sharma, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. R. D. Rastogi, ASG through VC, Mr. Anand Sharma, Adv. through VC, Mr. Akshay Bhardwaj, Adv. through VC ORDER The present bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in con ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nt did not turn and he had filed a complaint before Enforcement Directorate. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that petitioner had deposited the same amount in Allahabad Bank which was recovered by the E.D. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that petitioner had joined the investigation and narrated the whole story. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that trial court had issued warrant of arrest without assigning any cogent reason. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner filed an application under Section 70 (2) Cr.P.C. for conversion of non-bailable warrant into bailable warrant but the said application was rejected by the trial court on 17.09.2021. Nothing is to be reco ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f Punjab reported in (2018) 13 SCC 813; (2) Salauddin Abdul Samad Shakh Vs. State of Maharashtra reported in (1996) 1 SCC 667; (3) P. Chidambaram Vs. E.D. reported in (2019) 9 SCC 24; (4) Tamanna Begum Vs. E.D. in S. B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.4148/2020 decided on 01.06.2020; (5) Ambalal Punamchand Rashamwala Vs. State of Maharashtra Anr. reported in 1991 SCC online Bom 676; (6) Himanshu @ Hemant Vs. State of Maharashtra reported in 2015 (2) Mh.L.J.; (7) Girdhar Gopal Bajoria Vs. Rajesh Kumar Sharma in S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No.731/2021 decided on 23.09.2021; (8) Pooran Singh Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan in S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.474/2010 decided on 25.05.2010; (9) Shyam Sunder Singhvi Vs. Union of India in S ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
