2019 (10) TMI 1479

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... dvocate for defendant no. 1. Sh. Sharad, Advocate for defendant no. 2. Arguments on application u/o 1 Rule 10 CPC heard. Learned Sh. Sharad has submitted that defendant no. 2 is not a necessary party as the suit is based upon agreement which was entered into between plaintiff and defendant no. 1. Entire goods were supplied to defendant no. 1. Cheque for value of goods was also issued by defenda .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... onsidered. It is rightly submitted by learned Sh. Deepak that at this stage it would not be proper to strike out defendant no. 2 and defendant no. 2 appears to be proper party because firstly a letter purportedly issued by defendant no. 2 asking plaintiff to supply particulars for issuance of C­Form is on record. This prima facie reflects that defendant no. 2 was under obligation or at least .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X