Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2020 (11) TMI 1027

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... therefore, no interference in the finding of the Ld. CIT(A) is called for. Thus, Grounds raised by the assessee are dismissed. - ITA No.164/Ind/2018 - - - Dated:- 6-11-2020 - SHRI KUL BHARAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Appellant by S/Shri Ashish Goyal N.D. Patwa ARs Revenue by Shri Puneet Kumar Sr.DR ORDER PER KUL BHARAT, J.M: This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)(in short Ld. CIT(A) , Bhopal2 dated 19.12.2017 pertaining to assessment year 2014-15. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal: 1.On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals-II), Bhopal was .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... officer was of the view that income tax of ₹ 2,16,50,650/- paid on deemed income u/s 11(3) of the Act for A.Y.2013-14 would not be allowable. Therefore, he made addition of ₹ 2,16,50,650/- and assessed the income of ₹ 6,68,03,650/- against return filed at ₹ 4,51,53,000/-. 3. Aggrieved against this assessee preferred an appeal before Ld. CIT(A) who after considering the submissions dismissed the appeal and sustained the addition. 4. Now the assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal. The only effective ground is against sustaining the addition of ₹ 2,16,50,650/-. Ld. counsel for the assessee vehemently argued that the authorities below were not justified in making addition and sustaining the same. Ld. coun .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... different concepts both in nature and also purpose. while section 11(1) provides conditions under which income from property held for charitable or religious purposes may be treated as exempt from income tax, section 11(3) provided for the consequences of committing default or violation of the conditions laid down since section 11(1) and 11(2). The purpose of section 11(1) and 11(2) is to grant exemption to certain incomes subject to fulfillment of specified conditions. On the other hand, Section 11(3) is punitive in nature in so far it deems certain income as chargeable to tax, which is otherwise exempt, in the event of violation of conditions of section 11(1) and 11(2). 9. As already mentioned, the provision of section 11(3) are string .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... es to be eligible for exemption when the conditions are violated, income tax is attracted. If the same income tax is allowed as deduction, this will amount to incentivizing violations and defaults even in cases where the income of the trust has been misutilized or misapplied or diverted for purposes other than charitable or religious purposes. Such a situation is not comprehensible in law. 10. The cases cited by the appellant are distinguishable on facts. The type of income to be included as such u/s 11(1) are clearly provided in law. The deemed income u/s 11(3) is not included as income u/s 11(1). An item which is treated as deemed income because of legal fiction provided u/s 11(3), cannot be treated as income u/s 11(1). Law is .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates