9911796707
TMI Blog2021 (8) TMI 1266X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Garla Dinne, DR ORDER PER A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, A.M: These two appeals are filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-3, Hyderabad in appeal No.0099 & 0123/CIT(A)-3/15-16, dated 09/09/2016 passed U/s. 143(3) r.w.s 147 and U/s. 250(6) of the Act for the A.Y. 2011-12 and 2012-13. 2. The assessee has raised three grounds in his appeal for the A.Y. 2011-12 and they are extracted her ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... icer not to consider that transfer of land has taken place in Asst. Year 2011-12 and subjecting the same to Long Term Capital Gains in that A.Y. in the interest of justice." 3. The assessee has raised five grounds in his appeal for the A.Y. 2012-13 and they are extracted herein below for reference:- "1. The order of the CIT(A)-3, Hyderabad dated 9/9/2016 is erroneous, contrary to law and facts ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the fact that Dept. Took some time in granting permission for withdrawal of money from capital gains scheme account. 3. The CIT(A) ought to have seen that the A.O. having subjected to LTCG to tax in A.Y. 2011-12, is not justified in raising demand once again in A.Y. 2012-13 against sale of the same property. 4. For all the above and such other grounds as may be urged at the time of hearing it ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ) had no other option but to pass ex-parte order based on the materials available on record. Hence, it was pleaded that the order passed by the Ld. CIT(A) does not call for any interference. 5. We have heard the rival submissions and carefully perused the materials on record. On examining the facts of the case, We find merit in the submissions of the Ld. DR. The Ld. CIT (A) had posted the case on ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
