TMI Blog2022 (2) TMI 1108X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... T Act - HELD THAT:- After filing the appeal, which mandates a pre-deposit of 10%, a defect was pointed out that petitioner had not deposited the mandatory predeposit. Petitioner contended that since the order of cancellation of registration issued on 19.03.2021 enabled the petitioner to have his entire assessment orders set aside, the mandatory pre-deposit, if paid, would cause prejudice to the p ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ost, be utilised for availing the appropriate benefits while the appeal is considered on merits but not to overcome the mandate of pre-deposit under section 107 of the Act. This Court is of the view that since the petitioner had already invoked the appellate remedy, the said appeal ought to be pursued as contemplated by law - Petition dismissed. - WP (C) NO. 26301 OF 2021 - - - Dated:- 15-2-2 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ers issued under section 62 of the Act are illegal, warranting an interference by this Court, since petitioner had requested cancellation of registration with effect from 31.12.2017 and that the assessment orders were issued ignoring the said request. Petitioner also alleged that, based on the request of the petitioner for cancellation of registration, the Proper Officer had cancelled the registra ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... from Ext.P4, challenging the order of assessment. After filing the appeal, which mandates a pre-deposit of 10%, a defect was pointed out that petitioner had not deposited the mandatory predeposit. Petitioner contended that since the order of cancellation of registration issued on 19.03.2021 enabled the petitioner to have his entire assessment orders set aside, the mandatory pre-deposit, if paid, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e subsequent events can, at the most, be utilised for availing the appropriate benefits while the appeal is considered on merits but not to overcome the mandate of pre-deposit under section 107 of the Act. 6. In view of the above consideration, this Court is of the view that since the petitioner had already invoked the appellate remedy, the said appeal ought to be pursued as contemplated by law ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
