TMI Blog2022 (4) TMI 533X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... we find that any way this issue is no longer res integra as held by this Tribunal in the case of Lumino Industries Ltd. [ 2021 (11) TMI 926 - ITAT KOLKATA] wherein assessee s favour view was taken by the Tribunal after holding that the amendment brought in by Finance Act, 2021 w.e.f 1.04.2021 is prospective in operation and so will be in force from AY 2021-22 onwards and not retrospective. Assessee is to be allowed deduction in respect of employees contribution to PF ESI provided these are paid before the due date of filing the return of income. On the basis of records before us we are unable to ascertain the date of payments of these dues. Therefore, we are restoring the matter back to the file of the AO to examine and allow the sa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ustries Ltd. vs. ACIT, Circle-5(1), Kolkata in I.T.A. No.365/Kol/2021 for AY 2015-16 order dated 17.11.2021, wherein assessee s favour view was taken by the Tribunal after holding that the amendment brought in by Finance Act, 2021 w.e.f 1.04.2021 is prospective in operation and so will be in force from AY 2021-22 onwards and not retrospective. The relevant portions of decision which reads as under:- 17. Have heard both the parties. We note that the Finance Bill, 2021 has brought in an amendment which disallows the employees contribution made in PF and ESI if not made within the due date as prescribed by the respective statutes (PF and ESI Act). So after the amendment has been inserted according to Shri Miraj D Shah takes effect from 1 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ions of Section 43B shall not apply and shall be deemed never to have been applied for the purpose of determining the due date under this clause 18. We find that this amendment has been brought in the Act to provide certainty about the applicability of Section 43B in respect of belated payment of employees contribution. In order to test whether the amendment brought in later is retrospective or not one has to apply the test as laid by the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of M/s Snowtex Investment Ltd. (supra) wherein the Hon ble Supreme court took note of the law laid down on this issue by the Constitution Bench in M/s Vatika Township Ltd. and held that the intent of the Parliament/legislature need to be looked into for ascertain ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of revenue has not considered the decision of the Co-ordinate Division Bench decision in M/s Aimil Ltd.(supra) which is in favour of assessee. So we note that later decision of the Delhi/Hyderabad Tribunal have followed the decision favouring assessee in the light of the Hon ble Supreme Court decision in M/s Vegetable Products (supra). In the light of the aforesaid decision and relying on the ratio of the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of Vatika Township Pvt. Ltd. (supra) and M/s Snowtex Investment Ltd. (supra) and also taking note of the binding decision of the Hon ble Jurisdictional Calcutta High Court on this issue before us in Shri Vijayshree Ltd. Ltd.(supra), M/s Philips Carbon Black Ltd.(supra), M/s Coal India Ltd.(supra), M/s Akz ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
