TMI Blog2022 (4) TMI 1238X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... assed by learned Single Judge in M/S. K7 COMPUTING PRIVATE LIMITED, VERSUS THE COMMISSIONER, O/O. THE COMMISSIONER OF GST CENTRAL EXCISE, CHENNAI SOURTH [ 2020 (11) TMI 83 - MADRAS HIGH COURT ], the Division Bench while recording order was of the view that no interference was required in the order of learned Single Judge. Learned senior advocate for the applicant may be justified, standing at ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rned senior advocate for applicant / appellant / writ petitioner has submitted that the binding precedent, including the law having force of Article 141 of the Constitution of India which was put to notice at the relevant time was not considered and that error - which had crept up in the order of learned single Judge (W.P.No.25923 of 2018 dated 29.10.2020) ought to have been corrected and not doin ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on W.P.No.25923 of 2018 dated 29.10.2020, the Division Bench while recording order dated 05.08.2021 was of the view that no interference was required in the order of learned Single Judge. Learned senior advocate for the applicant may be justified, standing at the place of the applicant that the consideration of law as was cited, might have led to different conclusion. That itself, according to us, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
