TMI Blog2022 (6) TMI 285X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n KALPRAJ DHARAMSHI ANR. VERSUS KOTAK INVESTMENT ADVISORS LTD. ANR. [ 2021 (3) TMI 496 - SUPREME COURT] . In the said judgment, it was categorically held by this Court that an appeal against the order of NCLT shall be preferred within a period of 30 days from the date on which the order was passed by the NCLT. The Appellate Tribunal has the power to extend the period of limitation by another 1 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e of Creditors ( CoC ) on 04.04.2019 and was also approved by the NCLT on 22.10.2019. Thereafter, the Respondent No.1, Regional Provident Fund Commissioner filed a claim before the Resolution Professional on 09.10.2019 regarding the provident fund dues which was not considered. An appeal before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ( NCLAT ) was filed on 14.12.2020 by Respondent No. 1 agains ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... but such period shall not exceed fifteen days. The appellant contends that an appeal against an order passed by the NCLT has to be filed within 45 days from the date of passing of the order. In support of the said contention, the appellant relied upon the judgment of this Court in Civil Appeal Nos.2943-2944 of 2020 etc. dated 10.03.2021 titled Kalpraj Dharamshi Anr. vs. Kotak Investment ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ith the limitation prescribed by Section 61 of the IBC which fell for consideration of this Court in Kalpraj Dharamshi (supra). In the said judgment, it was categorically held by this Court that an appeal against the order of NCLT shall be preferred within a period of 30 days from the date on which the order was passed by the NCLT. The Appellate Tribunal has the power to extend the period of limit ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
