9911796707
TMI Blog2022 (7) TMI 1125X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... and under Section 409 IPC in Complaint Case No. 770/2019. 2. This court had issued notice to Mr. Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, learned CGSC on 11.07.2022, who accepted the same. On 11.07.2022, the court had also granted bail in BAIL APPLN. 2053/2022, BAIL APPLN. 2055/2022, and BAIL APPLN. 2056/2022 wherein the applicants were all retired UCO Bank's General Managers or Assistant General Managers. The present bail application was listed separately as the Applicant is still working with UCO Bank. Other than that, the matter is to be heard on the same footing. 3. The Ld. CGSC has stated that he does not wish to file a reply and has instructions to argue the matter, which he has very ably done. 4. The accused person has been arrested on ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... SL. [Dr. Rajesh Kumar Yaduvanshi v. SFIO, CRL. REV.P. No. 1308 of 2019 vide order dated 21.09.2020]. d. Co-accused, Mr. Pankaj Mahajan who is also a practicing Chartered Accountant at the firm, M/s. A.C. Gupta & Associates is also admitted on bail by a coordinate bench of this court in BAIL APPLN No. 1813 of 2022 titled Pankaj Mahajan v. SFIO dated 29.06.2022. e. A coordinate bench of this court also enlarged Rupesh Purwar, co-accused no. 203 on bail. He was signatory to the Financial Statements of the company for the FY 2013-14 and 2014-15 in his capacity as the Company Secretary, which he had signed for the purpose of regulatory filing of the Company. [Rupesh Purwar v. SFIO, CRL. M.C. No. 2878 of 2022 dated 29.06.2022] f. This Court ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n favour of the Applicant. There is also no reason shown for seeking judicial custody of the Applicant. 10. The main accused Nitin Johri and Neeraj Singhal have been granted bail, therefore, the applicant also needs to be enlarged on bail. 11. As regards the legal embargo of Section 212(6), I am of the view that Sub-section-(i) has duly been complied with, as the Public Prosecutor (Ld. CGSC) has been given a chance to oppose the bail application. I am prima facie of the view that the Applicant is not guilty of the offence of which he is charged with, and therefore, I am also of the opinion, that he is not likely to commit any further offence while on bail. Hence, sub-section (ii) of Section 212(6) is also complied with, notwithstanding th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
