9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (6) TMI 1451X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... JM ; This is the assessee's appeal for the assessment year 2007-08, against the order dated 26.05.2015, passed by the ld. CIT(A)-1, Jalandhar. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: "1. That the order of worthy CIT(A, Jalandhar dated 0.5.06.2015 is against the law and facts of this case. 2. That the worthy CIT(A), has wrongly confirmed the addition of Rs.3,37,49,994/- on ac ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ricultural income of Rs.96,000/-. The reassessment proceedings u/s 147 were initiated against the assessee, as the assessee had not declared entire long term capital gains accrued to him from transfer of his immovable property. In response to notice u/s 148, the assessee submitted that the revised return filed by him on 30.10.2009 may be treated as his returned filed in response to the said notice ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ITR 330 (P&H). 5. The ld. DR, on the other, relied on the impugned order. 6. Having heard the rival contentions in the light of the material placed on record, we are of the view that the case of the assessee is squarely covered by the decision of the Hon'ble High Court of Punjab & Haryana in the case of "Charanjit Singh Atwal vs. CIT", vide order, dated 22.07.2015, passed in ITA No.200 of 2013 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... JDA read with the registered special power of attorney dated 26.02.2007, it could not be held that the mandatory requirements of section 53A of the Transfer Act were complied with, which stood incorporated in section 2(47)(v) of the Act; that once that was so, it could not be said that the assessees were liable to capital gain tax in respect of the remaining land which was not transferred by them ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
