2022 (3) TMI 1415

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nt years 2018-19 and 2019-20. As both the appeals are based on similar facts and common grounds, I am, therefore, proceeding to dispose them off by this consolidated order for the sake of convenience. 2. For the A.Y. 2018-19, the assessee is aggrieved by the confirmation of addition of Rs.4,08,380/- made by the Assessing Officer (AO) on account of late deposit of the employees' share of Employee .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... f ESIC/PF was late deposited by the assessee but before the stipulated time u/s.139(1) of the Act, sustained the addition. 4. After considering the rival submissions and perusing the relevant material on record, it is seen that the issue under consideration is no more res integra in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in CIT Vs. Ghatge Patil Transports Ltd. (2014) 368 ITR 749 (B .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ng the provisions of the Finance Bill, 2021, provides that this amendment will take effect from 1st April, 2021 and will, accordingly, apply in relation to assessment year 2021-2022 and subsequent assessment years. Since the assessment year under consideration, namely, 2017- 18 is anterior to the amendment carried out with effect from A.Y. 2021-22, I hold that the position of law as set out by var .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X