Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2022 (9) TMI 158

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... seeking to revive the assessee's section 54F deduction disallowance of Rs.3.25 crores made by the Assessing Officer in his section 143(3) r.w.s. 254 order dated 28-11- 2016, we note that the CIT(A)'s detailed discussion to this effect reads as under : "5. Ground nos. 1 to 5: - As all these grounds relate to the common issue of disallowance of deduction u/s. 54F, therefore the same are disposed of together as under. 5.1 During the appellate proceedings, the appellant filed written submissions which are reproduced as under: "Contention:- 1. The AO received information from Addl. CIT, Range-3, Pune that during survey action u/s. 133A of the I.T. Act, 1961 in the case of Shri KailashBabulalWani conducted on 12-03-2008, it was noticed t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... y was purchased by the assessee. Therefore, he drawn the conclusion that the investment made by the appellant is not for purchase of house property but had entered in to a development agreement for developing the said property. This conclusion drawn by the AO in ale year 2016 is factually incorrect, which is evident from the fact that the appellant had not made any attempt to develop the said property. On the contrary it was brought to the notice of the AO during the course of assessment proceedings that the said property is sold after a period of 3 years as a residential property. Therefore, it is submitted that the conclusion drawn by the AO is merely on presumption and surmises. 6. In support of our claim u/s 54F of the Act the appella .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of a house, which could be used for a residence. The term 'residential house' came for discussion before the Orissa High Court in a wealth-tax case in CWT v. KB. Pradhan [19811 130 ITR 393/7 Taxman 220 wherein it was held that the word 'house' used for residential purposes would not include a house property in the process of construction, which is incomplete and not habitable. Only if the house has reached a stage of construction by which it is available for occupation and is otherwise habitable, the assessee can regard the property as being in the nature of a residential house, but not otherwise. This case and its logic can safely be utilized for understanding the meanings of' residential house' for the purposes of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... use property c. Appellant has not carried out any development on the said property d. Appellant had sold the said house property as it is in the year 2011-12 r.t. A.Y. 2012-13 and long-term loss is accepted u/sec. 143(1) of the Act. Copy of acknowledgement of return of income, computation sheet and Balance Sheet for F.Y. 2011-12 are enclosed (Refer page no.123-128) e. Description of property in the development agreement and the sale deed dated 24.08.2011, is the same. In the circumstances, we submit that the deduction u/s 54F is correctly claimed and accordingly request your Honor to kindly allow the same delete the addition made by the AO. Submitted for just and favourable consideration." 5.2 It is evident that the appellant ha .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 2 of page no.'" of the agreement, it is clearly mentioned that the lump-sum amount of Rs.3,25,00,000/- has been agreed as a consideration and the Developer i.e. the appellant shall pay the agreement amount to the Assignor, according to unanimous directions of the owners and the other consenting parties and subsequently the same were paid through cheques. Thus, it is established fact that the appellant had acquired a residential property in the form of an old bungalow. Therefore, the appellant would be entitled to deduction u/s 54F of the IT Act on this investment. There is no specific limitations as to the type of residential property one has to acquire u/s 54F of the IT Act." 3. Suffice to say, it has come on record that this is seco .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates