TMI Blog2022 (9) TMI 1180X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ncome u/s 139(1) of the Act then such disallowances are uncalled for - we delete the alleged disallowance made towards contribution towards PF ESI and allow grounds raised by the assessee. Adjustment of profit on sale of motor car - assessee being a private limited company while computing the total income firstly disallowed the depreciation calculated as per the Companies Act and then reduced the income by the depreciation as per the Income Tax Act - Profit on sale of motor car was also reduced. - HELD THAT:- On perusal of the depreciation chart find that at serial no. 11 the assessee has shown the asset generator and car under the block of 15% opening Written Down Value there is an addition in the block and the sale consideration of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s of the case, the order passed by the Ld. C.I.T.(A) on 17.12.2021 is completely arbitrary, unjustified and illegal. 2. For that on the facts of the case, that while issuing intimation u/s. 143(1) could not deny the adjustment claimed by the assessee as the same does not come within the ambit of 'an incorrect claim apparent from any information in the return', therefore, enhanced the gross total income made by the CPC was without jurisdiction which is confirmed by the Ld. CIT(A), as such his finding is completely arbitrary, unjustified and illegal. 3. For that on the facts of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) was wrong that while processing the return u/s. 143(1) of the I.T. Act, the A.O. was not adjusting amounting to Rs.329,314/- ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e settled position of law passed by the Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of Vijayshree Ltd. (supra), since there is no retrospective legislative over-ruling. Therefore, the finding of the Ld. CIT(A) is completely arbitrary, unjustified and illegal. 7. For that in charging interest u/s. 234B at Rs.23,047/- 234C at Rs.6,181/-, which is mechanically wrong and illegal. 8. For that the appellant reserves the right to adduce any further ground or grounds, if necessary, at or before the hearing of the appeal. 3. From perusal of the grounds, I notice that in the proceedings u/s 143(1) of the Act addition in the income of the assessee was made on account of two adjustments: i) Profit on sale of motor car at Rs. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... disallowance made towards contribution towards PF ESI of Rs. 1,61,466/- and allow grounds nos. 5 6 raised by the assessee. 7. As regards the second issue of the adjustment of profit on sale of motor car at Rs. 3,29,314/-. I, on going through the computation of income and the depreciation chart as per the income tax notice that the assessee being a private limited company while computing the total income firstly disallowed the depreciation calculated as per the Companies Act at Rs. 7,75,453/- and then reduced the income by the depreciation as per the Income Tax Act at Rs. 6,43,052/-. Profit on sale of motor car at Rs. 3,29,314/- was also reduced. It seems that the computer system while processing the return of the assessee was unable ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
