Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2022 (9) TMI 1382

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ons of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'Act') for assessment year (AY) 2012-13. 2. A return of income was filed by the petitioner within time and an intimation u/s 143(1) of the Act issued. Thereafter, the matter was selected for scrutiny and notice under Section 143(2) was issued on 19.08.2019 calling for verification of various issues that arose from the return of income. One of the issues in specific related to the claim of additional depreciation under Section 32(1)(iia) in relation to a wind mill owned and managed by the petitioner. 3. After considering the response of the petitioner, an order of assessment had come to be passed on 30.03.2015, wherein at internal page 2, the Assessing Authority refers to petitioner's c .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... in 2 parts. 40% claimed on the addition made during the current financial year 2011-12 @ 40% since the windmill has been purchased in the second half of the financial year. The said amount works out to Rs.43,06,615/-. The second part of the additional depreciation is on the opening balance of the windmill block i.e. as at 01.04.2011, the same has been worked out at 10% for the second half. Based on the submissions made by the assessee, it is to be seen whether the assessee satisfies the conditions as prescribed in Section 32(1)(iia) of the IT Act allowing additional depreciation as claimed. It is seen from the provisions of section 32(1)(iia) that the new machinery or plant has to be acquired and installed as at 31.03.2012, in the instant c .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n that the erection and installation alongwith civil work has been undertaken at the fag end of the financial year 2011-12. It can therefore be seen from the above that certain equipments has been only dispatched on 29.03.2012 from Pondicherry and Gujarat. It is therefore not possible for the assessee who have acquired and installed the said machinery of its sight in Coimbatore in support of the assessee's claim for grant of additonal depreciation. In support of commissioning of the windmill, the assessee has submitted cpies of certificate issued by TANGEDCO. Perusal of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Commissioning Certificate shows that the same has been commissioned on 30.09.2008 for the wind electric generator of 600 KW capacity, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... dated 23.10.2018, a copy of which is not placed on file. The response of the petitioner dated 26.08.2019 is an integrated one addressing both the notice under Section 153C as well as the impugned proceedings for re-assessment. 9. In line with the procedure set out in the case of GKN Drive Shafts (India) Pvt. Ltd. V. Income Tax Officer (259 ITR 19), the reasons for reassessment were supplied under cover of letter dated 13.09.2019 and read as under: 'As requested by you, the reason for reopening the assessment as per record is as under. In the assessment order passed u/s,143(3) dated 30-03-2015 additional depreciation of Rs.85,54,694/- was disallowed i.e., 10% on cost of windmills generator amounting to Rs.8,55,46,945/- on the groun .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tion 142 or section 148 or to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for his assessment, for that assessment year. 12. Thus, in this case, seeing as the assessment framed originally was under scrutiny, the Assessing Authority could proceed to re-assess the income under Section 147, only if he is in a position to, and does, establish that the alleged escapement is on account of the petitioner having failed to make a full and true disclosure at the first instance. 13. A perusal of the reasons would indicate that there is no tangible material that has been found by the Assessing Authority, post assessment, to lead to a conclusion that the original disclosure made by the petitioner was either incomplete or untrue. In fact, the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates