TMI Blog2017 (8) TMI 1677X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... cating authority to first decide the issue of jurisdiction after the availability of Hon ble Supreme Court decision in the case of UNION OF INDIA VERSUS MANGALI IMPEX LTD. [ 2016 (8) TMI 1181 - SC ORDER] and then on merits of the case but by providing an opportunity to the assessee of being heard. Till the final decision, the status quo will be maintained. The appeal filed by the assessee is allowed by way of remand. - Appeal No. C/52254/2015-CU[DB] - Final Order No. 55669/2017 - Dated:- 1-8-2017 - Hon ble Mr. Justice (Dr.) Satish Chandra, President And Hon ble Mr. V. Padmanabhan, Technical Member For the Appellant : Present Shri Abhinav Jaganathan, Advocate. For the Respondent : Present Shri Govind Dixit, DR. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s in the present appeal is regarding the jurisdiction of the DRI Officers to issue the show cause notice under the Customs Act. The assessee-Appellant had taken a stand that in terms of the Hon ble Apex Court decision in the case of Commissioner of Customs vs. Sayed Ali, 2011 (265) 17 (S.C.)], the DRI officers were not proper officers in terms of section 2(34) of the Customs Act, 1962. 5. It is also seen that after the declaration of law by the Hon ble Supreme Court (Supra), the provisions of section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962 were amended with effect from 08.04.2011 vide Finance Act, 2011. 6. It is also noticed that in order to overcome the situation created by the judgment of Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of Sayed Ali ( ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Gupta vs. Union of India [2015 (315) E.L.T. 167 (Bom) as also of the Hon ble High Court of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh in the case of Vuppalamritha Magnetic Components Ltd. vs. DRI (Zonal Unit), Chennai [2017 (345) E.L.T. 161 (AP)], taking a view contrary to the one taken by the Hon ble Delhi High Court. 10. Being conflicting decisions of various High Courts (Supra), finally the matter reached to Hon ble Supreme Court who on 07/10/2016 granted the stay of operation of the judgment passed by the High Court of Delhi. Thus the issue is sub-judice before the Hon ble Supreme Court [2016-TIOL-173-SC-CUS / 2016 (339) ELT A 49 (SC)]. 11. It may be mentioned that recently, the Hon ble High Court of Delhi in the case of BSNL Vs. UOI vi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
