9911796707
TMI BlogGST on Residential ProjectX X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... GST on Residential Project X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... and many other places, it is mentioned as 1% (0.5 + 0.5). Please guide. Reply By Amit Agrawal: The Reply: Both things are correct, if taken from angle of generally followed trade practices of expression. The actual tax-rate of 1.5% becomes effective rate of 1% of total consideration once you reduce 'deemed value of one third of the total consideration for such supply' towards the ' ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... value of transfer of land or undivided share of land' so as to arrive at 'value of construction services for payment of gst'. In other words, 2/3 (1.5%) = 1%. These are ex facie views of mine and the same should not be construed as professional advice / suggestion. Reply By Kaustubh Karandikar: The Reply: Thanks Amit Sir for yur quick and accurate guidance. Reply By Padmanathan ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Kollengode: The Reply: In my humble opinion, the correct rate of tax is 1.5% (0.75% + 0.75%). However, since 1/3 abatement is given to the land value, the effective rate will be 1%. For disclosure in returns, the value after abatement of land must be under declared under 1.5% rate Reply By Shilpi Jain: The Reply: Agreed. The rate of tax is actually 1.5% and the deduction of 1/3rd given is only ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... in the valuation. This is the manner in which the disclosure should also be made in the returns. Many times it is seen that the taxpayers disclose rate of tax as 1% and 5% instead of 1.5% and 7.5% for affordable and other than affordable residential projects Reply By Amit Agrawal: The Reply: I agree with Ms. Shilpi Mam that for disclosure under GST records / submissions, tax-invoices etc., tax ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... -payer should disclose tax-rate @ 1.5% or 7.5% (& not 1% or 5%), as the case may be and taxable value as ''2/3 of 'total consideration which includes land'' (& not 100% of 'total consideration which includes land). These are ex facie views of mine and the same should not be construed as professional advice / suggestion. Reply By Amit Agrawal: The Reply: Though my post a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t serial number 1 states the same thing, it is better to give further clarity for better understanding for everyone.
Reply By Kaustubh Karandikar:
The Reply:
thanks amit ji and shilpi ji for your support as always X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
