2007 (1) TMI 172

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... cation for the Revenue to file the present appeals which merely relied upon the primary orders passed – revenue cannot be allowed to recover tax from one assessee, while declining to recover tax from others – revenue’s appeal dismissed - 708 of 2006 - - - Dated:- 17-1-2007 - MADAN B. LOKUR and V. B. GUPTA JJ. Sanjeev Sabharwal for the appellant P. N. Monga with Manu Monga for the respo .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s have been accepted by the Revenue and have not been challenged by filing an appeal. 6. Following the decision of the Supreme Court in Union of India v. Satish Panalal Shah [2001] 249 ITR 221 and this court in CIT v. A. R. J. Security Printers [2003] 264 ITR 276 and for the reasons mentioned by us in I. T. A. Nos. 1091/2006, 1115/2006 and 1098/2006 (CIT v. Moonlight Builders and Devel .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X