2008 (8) TMI 139

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Kumar, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per: S.N. Jha, President]. - By this application purportedly filed as an application for rectification of mistake under Section 35C(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, the applicant in effect and substance seeks review of the stay order dated 25-4-2008 [2008 (11) S.T.R. 485 (Tribunal)] on the ground that while dealing with an identical issue in the case of M/ .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... en held that where a case is decided on difference of opinion by third Member it would amount to decision by a three Member Bench. Be that as it may, we are of the view that a speaking order having been passed, after full hearing, rightly or wrongly, the remedy of the applicant was/is by way of a writ petition, if so advised, in the High Court, and the subsequent order of the co-ordinate Bench can .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X