TMI Blog2023 (3) TMI 1199X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... eld as above. The impugned notice in this petition u/s 148 of the Act relatable to Assessment year 2014- 15 is beyond the permissible time limit, therefore, liable to be treated illegal and without jurisdiction. Since the petition deserves to be allowed on the aforesaid crisp legal ground alone, learned advocates for the parties submitted to agree that facts and other legal issues may not be gone into by the Court. Accordingly, they are neither delineated, nor are gone into.All other questions on facts and of law involved in the reasons weighed with Assessing Officer seeking to reopen the assessment are kept open. As a result, notice dated 30.6.2021 issued by the respondent- Assessing Officer under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, seeking to reopen the assessment in respect of Assessment Year 2014-15, Order dated 21.7.2022 passed by the Respondent under Section 148A(d) of the Act, and all consequential actions, as may have been taken, are hereby quashed and set aside. - HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.V.ANJARIA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIRAL R. MEHTA MS. KRUTI M SHAH(2428) FOR THE PETITIONER(S) NO. 1 MR VARUN PATEL FOR MR NIKUNT RAVAL FOR THE RESPONDENT( ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 2014-15 is covered and the impugned notice is without jurisdiction as it is beyond the time limit prescribed. 5. In order to properly understand the controversy and the applicable provisions in particular, prior to coming into force of Finance Act, 2021 called old regime as well as the provisions introduced in the Finance Act, 2021 described as new regime, the development of the law emanating from Keenara Industries Pvt. Ltd. (supra) in that regard may be revisited with, by noticing the aspects considered and decided in the said decision. 5.1 Section 147 of the Act empowers the assessing officer to reassess the income of the assessee subject to the provisions of Sections 148 to 151 of the Act in case any income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. 5.1.1 Prior to the applicability of Finance Act, 2021 with effect from 01.04.2021, for the provisions of section 149 then existed, notice under section 148 could be issued for the relevant assessment year within four/six years from the end of the relevant assessment year concerned. Section 149 as operated in the old regime prior to the Finance Act, 2021, reads as under, 149. Time limit for notice.-(1) No notice under s ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... with substitution of new section 148A, section 149 of the Act was also recast by the legislature. 5.2.1 Section 149 of the Act, as inducted by the Finance Act, 2021 in the statute book and made applicable with effect from 01.04.2021 is as under, 149. Time limit for notice- (1) No notice under section 148 shall be issued for the relevant assessment year, (a) if three years have elapsed from the end of the relevant assessment year, unless the case falls under clause (b); (b) if three years, but not more than ten years, have elapsed from the end of the relevant assessment year unless the Assessing Officer has in his possession books of account or other documents or evidence which reveal that the income chargeable to tax, represented in the form of asset, which has escaped assessment amounts to or is likely to amount to fifty lakh rupees or more for that year: Provided that no notice under section 148 shall be issued at any time in a case for the relevant assessment year beginning on or before 1st day of April, 2021, if such notice could not have been issued at that time on account of being beyond the time limit specified under the provisions of clause (b) o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t is to be noticed with relevance is that the First Proviso to section 149 of the Act as introduced in Finance Act, 2021, inter alia stipulated that no notice under section 148 shall be issued at any time in a case for the relevant Assessment Year beginning on or before 1st day of April 2021, if such notice could not have been issued at that time on account of being beyond the time limit specified under the provision as it stood immediately before the commencement of the Finance Act, 2021. 5.2.4 In other words, in respect of the notice under section 148 of the Act relating to the assessment year beginning on or before 01.04.2021, the operational conditions in the provision as they stood before 01.04.2021 were maintained. It thus included the factor of prescription of time limit-the limitation. 5.3 It may be mentioned that in wake of spread of pandemic of Covid-19 around March 2020 and onwards, leading to the lockdown resulting into societal affairs coming to a standstill, Ordinance No. 2/20 dated 31.03.2020 was promulgated by the Central Government, titled as the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment Of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020, which became the Act sub ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ent and orders passed by the different High Courts from where the matters had travelled by issuing the following directions, extracting from SCC, The impugned section 148 notices issued to the respective assessees which were issued under unamended section 148 of the IT Act, which were the subject matter of writ petitions before the various respective High Courts shall be deemed to have been issued under section 148A of the IT Act as substituted by the Finance Act, 2021 and construed or treated to be showcause notices in terms ofsection 148A(b). The assessing officer shall, within thirty days from today provide to the respective assessees information and material relied upon by the Revenue, so that the assesees can reply to the showcause notices within two weeks thereafter; The requirement of conducting any enquiry, if required, with the prior approval of specified authority under section 148A(a) is hereby dispensed with as a onetime measure vis vis those notices which have been issued under section 148 of the unamended Act from 01.04.2021 till date, including those which have been quashed by the High Courts. Even otherwise as observed hereinabove holding any enquir ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sment year unless the income chargeable to tax, which has escaped assessment, amounts to or is likely to amount to one lakh rupees or more for that year. 5.4.8 In other words, limitation of six years from the end of relevant assessment year operated as timeline in the old regime for issuance of notice under section 148 beyond which period, it was not competent for the assessing officer to issue notice for reassessment. This embargo is made to continue in the new regime also. 5.5 Now the reopening notices which related to the period prior to 01.04.2021, but issued between 01.04.2021 to 30.06.2021 came to be challenged before the Division Bench of this Court in Keenara Industries Pvt. Ltd. (supra), by placing reliance on directions in paragraph 28.5 of Ashish Agarwal (supra:SCC), and thus by contending that since they were issued after six years from the end of the relevant assessment year, they were barred and were without jurisdiction. 5.6 In Keenara Industries Pvt. Ltd. (supra), the Division Bench noticed the crux of the contents on that count raised by the petitioners in the following paragraphs, 2.14 According to the petitioner, the impugned notice is barred by lim ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020, was not the permissible device whereby the time limit could be legitimately extended for the purpose of issuing Notices under Section 148, which were otherwise barred in terms of Section 149, as it exists in the old regime. 5.8.1 The Taxation and Other Laws Act, 2020 was rightly viewed to be a secondary legislation. It was therefore held that secondary legislation would not override the principal legislation-the Finance Act, 2021. Also negatived by the Division Bench in Keenara Industries Pvt. Ltd. (supra) as per observations in paragraph 36 of the judgment, the concept of freezing the time limit. It was held that it was not permissible in law for the Revenue to travel back in time. Nor does the Taxation and Other Laws Act endorse to such concept. It was held as per paragraphs 38 and 39 of the Keenara Industries Pvt. Ltd. (supra) that Notifications extending the due dates under the old provisions could not breath any more after the repeal of the old provisions. 5.8.2 In paragraph 21, it was observed that the Taxation Laws Relaxation Act, 2020, did not elongate the erstwhile scheme, 21. It is to be noted that while enacting th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 2021. The new provision introduce by Finance Act, 2021 came into force on 01.04.2021 therefore, the limitation for issuance of notice under section 148 of the Act prescribed under the old regime of reopening expired on 01.04.2021 for assessment year 2013-14 and 2014-15. 20.3 Therefore, in plain words, a notice which had become time barred prior to 01.04.2021 as per the then provisions cannot be revived under new regime by applying section 149 (1)(b) of the Act which came into effect from 01.04.2021. 6.1 Keenara Industries Pvt. Ltd. (supra) thus considered the question of limitation vis-a-vis notices for reopening of the assessment issued for the Assessment Year 2013-14 and Assessment Year 2014-15. The final statement of law could be said to be contained in para 52 of Keenara Industries Pvt. Ltd. (supra), A conjoint reading of section 149(1) proviso w.e.f. 01.04.2021 along with section 149(1)(b) prior to 01.04.2021. The case of the petitioner for assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15 cannot be reopened. The assessment year is 2013-14 (01.04.2012 to 31.03.2013) and assessment year 2014-15 (01.04.2013 to 31.03.2014). The end of assessment year is 31.03.2014 and 31.03.2 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
