TMI Blog2023 (4) TMI 594X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... account by the applicant from the investors clearly shows his active involvement and participation in the scheme and also being a part of group of persons involved in the scheme of embezzlement of huge amount. The money received from investors even in the account of the applicant directly have not been returned back to them. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court does not find it to be a fit case for bail in all the bail applications - bail application dismissed. - Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. - 39228 of 2020, 39394 of 2020, 41587 of 2020, 41588 of 2020, 46289 of 2020, 46295 of 2020, 5326 of 2021, 5339 of 2021, 5354 of 2021, 5370 of 2021, 6581 of 2021, 6585 of 2021, 6588 of 2021 with 6590 of 2021 - - - Dated:- 3-4-2023 - Hon'ble Samit Gopal, J. For the Applicant : Atul Srivastava For the Opposite Party : G.A. ORDER HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J. 1. These are 14 bail applications connected together. The said 14 bail applications are in different case crime numbers but are of the same accused namely Pushpendra Singh and are also in one case which pertains to Bike Bot Scheme and as such have been heard together and ar ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ) Crl. Misc. Bail Application No. 6588 of 2021, Case Crime No. 368 of 2019, Under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 409, 201, 120-B IPC, P.S. Dadri, District Gautam Budh Nagar. xiv) Crl. Misc. Bail Application No. 6590 of 2021, Case Crime No. 367 of 2019, Under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 409, 201, 120-B IPC, P.S. Dadri, District Gautam Budh Nagar. 3 . The facts arising out of in all cases as per version of the First Information Report lodged under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406, 506 IPC against Sanjay Bhati M.D., Rajesh Bhardwaj, Karan Pal Singh and Pawan Rana, Leader are that there is a company by the name of M/s Gravit Innovative Promoters Company Limited which was involved in the work of Bike Bot taxi services in which various persons had invested money. A written agreement was entered into between the M.D. of the company and the said investors. Sanjay Bhati was the M.D. of the company. Rajesh Bhardwaj and Karan Pal Singh were the Directors of the company and Pawan Rana was the Leader who were also involved in the working of the company. The said persons neither gave any taxi bike to the investors nor did they give the assured money back to them. The invested amount was em ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 12. Hareesh Kumar Additional Director 22.12.2018 01.02.2019 13. Vinod Kumar Additional Director 22.12.2018 01.02.2019 14. Vishal Kumar Additional Director 22.12.2018 01.02.2019 15. Lalit Kumar Additional Director 22.12.2018 01.02.2019 16. Ravinder Kumar Additional Director 22.12.2018 01.02.2019 17. Shoo Dev Additional Director 22.12.2018 14.01.2019 18. Sanjay Goel Additional Director 22.12.2018 14.01.2019 19. Lokendra Singh Additional Director 22.12.2018 01.02.2019 20. Pushpendra Singh Addit ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 206 of 2019. The said order is quoted herein-below:- By way of these writ petitions, the petitioners have sought overlapping reliefs concerning Bike Bot Scheme. In Writ Petition (Crl.) No.197/2021, following reliefs have been claimed by the petitioner: a) Consolidate and club all the FIRs in regard to Bike Bot Scheme, wherein the Petitioner has been arrayed and will be arrayed as accused and appoint a Special Investigation Team for conducting the Investigations in the abovementioned FIRs, and/or, b) Grant bail to the Petitioner and direct his release from custody with respect to all the F.I.R.s emanating out of the Bike Bot Scheme registered within the jurisdiction of Uttar Pradesh, Delhi and at any other place without the knowledge of the Petitioner and/or, c) Grant protection to the Petitioner in all the FIRs already lodged and in all the future FIRs with regard to Bike Bot Scheme, wherein the Petitioner will be arrayed as Accused, and/or, d) In the alternative grant bail to the Petitioner on interim basis till such time that his bail applications pending before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad are finally adjudicated upon and decided by the High ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed as accused and appoint a Special Investigation Team for conducting the Investigations in the abovementioned FIRs, and/or, b) Grant bail to the Petitioner and direct his release from custody with respect to all known FIRs (as per Annexure P-10) as well as the unknown FIRs emanating out of the 'Bike Bot Scheme' registered or yet to be registered within the jurisdiction of Uttar Pradesh and FIR No.123 of 2019 registered at Delhi and at any other place with or without the knowledge of the Petitioner and such other FIRs arising out of the 'Bike Bot Scheme', that may be registered in the future and/or; c) Grant protection to the Petitioner in all the FIRs already lodged and in all the future FIRs with regard to Bike Boat Scheme, wherein the Petitioner will be arrayed as Accused, and/or; d) In the alternative grant Bail to the Petitioner in all the pending matters against the Petitioner on interim basis, till such time that his all-Bail Applications pending before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad as well as before the Rohini District and Sessions Court are finally adjudicated upon and decided by the concerned Courts, and/or e) Any other Orde ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Allahabad in 2 similar FIRs; (C) To allow release of the petitioner in respect of all the FIRs, on the basis of same set of conditions as stipulated by the Hon'ble High Court of Allahabad in its Bail Order dated 18.10.2021 which should hold good for all the cases for release of the petitioner in the entire Bile Bot matter; (D) Consolidate all the aforesaid cases mentioned in para 6, pertaining to Bike Bot Scheme floated by accused Sanjay Bhati, Director of GIPL, to the Court(s) at Gautam Budh Nagar (UP), for the purpose of fair and expeditious trial; and may also (E) Direct the respondents herein, that upon granting bail, the petitioner be released on the same one(1) set of sureties with his personal bond which shall hold good for all the cases; and may also (F) Pass such other order(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. In Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 91/2022, the petitioner has sought following reliefs: A. Grant regular bail to the Petitioner in all the known FIRs/Case Crimes arising out of the Bike Bot Scheme where in the Petitioner is arrested in accordance with his custody certificate da ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on (Crl.) No. 522/2021, the petitioner has claimed following reliefs: a) Transfer the investigation to CBI or any other similar investigating agency in regard to Bike Bot Scheme, wherein the Petitioner has been arrayed and will be arrayed as accused abovementioned FIRs, and/or; b) Grant bail to the petitioner and direct her release from custody with respect to all the FIRs emanating out of the Bike Bot Scheme registered within the jurisdiction of Uttar Pradesh, Delhi and at any other place/State with or without the knowledge of the Petitioner and /or; c) Grant protection to the Petitioner in all the FIRs already lodged and in all the future FIRs with regard to Bike Bot Scheme, wherein the Petitioner will be arrayed as Accused, and/or; d) Any other Order this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the present case. Although, diverse reliefs have been claimed in these writ petitions, the learned counsel appearing for the parties have broadly agreed that they would confine the relief of clubbing of multiple FIRs in respect of Bike Bot Scheme with the principal FIR bearing No.206/2019 dated 12.02.2019 registered at Police Station Dadri, District Gautam Budh Nagar, Utta ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... etitioner(s) and named accused therein. Furthermore, the trial shall proceed as per law from the stage of filing of the supplementary charge sheet. In case the Courts have already taken cognizance on the basis of chargesheet(s) filed in respective cases, those cases in terms of this order shall stand transferred and merged with the trial of the case arising from FIR No.206/2019. During the course of hearing, it was brought to our notice that the petitioner(s) have filed some applications under Section 340 of Cr.P.C. to initiate action against the Investigating Agency. In the back drop of the indulgence shown to the petitioner(s) in terms of this order, learned counsel for the petitioner(s), on instructions, submits that the stated applications filed before the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dadri, District Gautam Budh Nagar shall not be pursued and pressed. Therefore, the said application(s) [3] are withdrawn to this Court and stand disposed of accordingly. The passport and the amount deposited by the concerned petitioner(s) in the writ petition(s) in this Court or any other court as condition for grant of bail, along with accrued interest, if any, shall stand ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Y ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Dadri, Meerut. 13. FIR No. 340/19 dated 24.3.2019 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Dadri, Meerut. 14. FIR No. 361/19 dated 30.3.2019 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Dadri, Meerut. 15. FIR No. 362/19 dated 30.3.2019 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Dadri, Meerut. 16. FIR No. 372/19 dated 31.3.2019 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Dadri, Meerut. 17. FIR No. 386/19 dated 04.4.2019 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Dadri, Meerut. 18. FIR No. 410/19 dated 16.4.2019 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Dadri, Meerut. 19. FIR No. 440/19 dated 25.4.2019 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Dadri, Meerut. 20. FIR No. 602/19 dated 21.6.2019 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Dadri, Meerut ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 1/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Dadri, Meerut. 38. FIR No. 509/19 dated 19.5.2019 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Dadri, Meerut. 39. FIR No. 586/19 dated 16.6.2019 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Dadri, Meerut. 40. FIR No. 507/19 dated 19.5.2019 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Dadri, Meerut. 41. FIR No. 508/19 dated 19.5.2019 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Dadri, Meerut. 42. FIR No. 510/19 dated 19.5.2019 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Dadri, Meerut. 43. FIR No. 511/19 dated 19.5.2019 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Dadri, Meerut. 44. FIR No. 512/19 dated 20.5.2019 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Dadri, Meerut. 45. FIR No. 513/19 dated 20.5.2019 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 019 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Dadri, Meerut. 63. FIR No. 1320/19 dated 29.11.2019 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Dadri, Meerut. 64. FIR No. 1371/19 dated 14.12.2019 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Dadri, Meerut. 65. FIR No. 33/20 dated 08.1.2020 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Dadri, Meerut. 66. FIR No. 35/20 dated 09.1.2020 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Dadri, Meerut. 67. FIR No. 70/20 dated 16.1.2020 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Dadri, GBN District, Meerut. 68. FIR No. 71/20 dated 16.1.2020 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Dadri, GBN District, Meerut. 69. FIR No. 388/20 dated 04.6.2020 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Dadri, GBN District, Meerut. 70. FIR No. 108/20 dated 12.1 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 09.2.2020 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Sector 20 Noida, GBN District, Meerut. 86. FIR No. 41/21 dated 19.1.2021 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Dadri, GBN District, Meerut. 87. FIR No. 44/21 dated 20.1.2021 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Dadri, GBN District, Meerut. 88. FIR No. 91/21 dated 10.2.2021 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Dadri, GBN District, Meerut. 89. FIR No. 128/21 dated 01.3.2021 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Dadri, GBN District, Meerut. 90. FIR No. 797/20 dated 28.11.2020 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Kotwali Nagar, Bijnor District, Meerut. 91. FIR No. 952/20 dated 24.5.2020 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Sihanigate, GZB District, Meerut. 92. FIR No. 947/20 dated 23.5.2020 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... /76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Kotwali Nagar, BHR District Meerut. 108. FIR No. 283/20 dated 31.12.2020 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Kotwali Nagar, BHR District Meerut. 109. FIR No. 1638/20 dated 31.12.2020 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Kotwali Nagar, BHR District Meerut. 110. FIR No. 1496/20 dated 20.11.2020 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Kotwali Nagar, BHR District Meerut. 111. FIR No. 115/21 dated 29.1.2021 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Kotwali Nagar, BHR District Meerut. 112. FIR No. 450/21 dated 12.4.2021 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Kotwali Nagar, BHR District Meerut. 113. FIR No. 913/20 dated 29.10.2020 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) RBI ACT at Baraut, BPT District Meerut. 114. FIR No. 72/21 dated 09.3.2021 registered u/s 420/467/468/471/409/201/120B IPC/76A-2013 COMPANY ACT 58B(4A) R ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he said order is quoted herein-below:- Writ Petition(s)(Criminal) No(s). 197/2021, 292/2021, 452/2021, 518/2021, 59/2022, 91/2022, 114/2022 and 522/2021 The writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the signed order. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. SLP(Crl) No. 1816-1820/2022 De-linked. List this matter on 13.07.2022. W.P.(Crl.) No. 242/2019 By this writ petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought following reliefs: a) To issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction thereby directing the respondent no.3 CBI to investigate into all the offences alleged against the Petitioner in the FIRs mentioned in Table 3 hereto (Synopsis Page G) and other FIRs not in the knowledge of the Petitioner, involving identical allegations; b) In the alternative, consolidate the FIRs mentioned in Table No.1(Synopsis Page F) into one single mother FIR and all FIRs be investigated and tried by one single agency as this Hon ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case; c) Grant bail to the petitioner herein in all FIRs, known ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... opinion that multiplicity of the proceedings will not be in the larger public interest as well. It is brought to our notice that investigation in respect of some FIRs has been completed and even chargesheet(s) have been filed by the Special Investigation Team (SIT), constituted by the State of Uttar Pradesh in respect of all these cases. In terms of this order, the chargesheet(s) filed in other cases shall stand merged with the chargesheet filed in criminal case arising out of FIR No.353/2015. Further, it will be open to the Investigating Officer in the case registered as FIR No.353/2015, to file a supplementary chargesheet, which will be a composite chargesheet to deal with all the statements collated during the investigation in the other cases, including the statement of the complainant in the respective FIR as being statement under Section 161 of the Cr.P.C. The supplementary chargesheet to be filed on the basis of the entire record so collected during the investigation in the respective cases will be then made the basis to proceed for trial against the petitioner and named accused therein. Furthermore, the trial shall proceed as per law from the stage of filing of the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 1. FIR No.1016/2017 dated 20.11.2017 registered at P.S. Kasna 22. FIR No.277/2018 dated 16.04.2018 registered at P.S. Kasna 23. FIR No.254/2018 dated 23.03.2018 registered at New Agra 24. FIR No.353/2015 dated 09.06.2015 registered at P.S. Kasna 25. FIR No.544/2017 dated 25.06.2017 registered at P.S. Kasna 26. FIR No.185/2019 dated 09.03.2019 registered at P.S. Kasna 27. FIR No.545/2019 dated 29.06.2019 registered at P.S. Kasna 28. FIR No.309/2019 dated 12.04.2019 registered at P.S. Kasna 29. FIR No.842/2016 dated 02.12.2016 registered at Surajpur 30. FIR No.117/2018 dated 16.02.2018 registered at P.S. Kasna 31. FIR No.361/2018 dated 18.05.2018 registered at P.S. Kasna 32. FIR No.258/2019 dated 26.03.2019 registered at P.S. Kasna 33. FIR No.251/2019 dated 25.03.2019 registered at P.S. Kasna 34. FIR No.272/2019 dated 28.03.2019 registered at P.S. Kasna 35. FIR No.814/2018 dated 27.09.2018 registered at P.S. Kasna 36. FIR No.668/2018 dated 22.08.2018 registered at P.S. Kasna 37. FIR No.813/2018 dated 27.09.2018 registered at P.S. Kasna 38. FIR No.773/2019 dated 11.08.2019 registered at P.S. Kasna ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dingly. 10 . Co-accused Adesh Bhati @ Ajeet Kumar was granted bail vide order dated 20.07.2021 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 21115 of 2021 (Adesh Bhati @ Ajeet Bhati Vs. State of U.P.) passed by this Court. The said order is quoted herein-below:- Criminal Misc. Exemption Application is allowed. Counter affidavit filed on behalf of State is on record. Heard Shri Atul Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for the applicant, Shri Shri Syed Ali Murtaza, learned AGA for the State. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the applicant that although several criminal cases have been lodged against the applicant showing him the Director of the company concerned yet he was not Director at any point of time of the company concerned. Applicant was only associated with the main accused. Investment was also made by the applicant in the Bike Boat Scheme. Assured profit was not being returned to the applicant as per scheme by the company, as agreed between them, and in lieu thereof some post dated cheques were issued by the company in favour of the applicant, which was not encashed. Thus, applicant himself is the sufferer in the present matter. Amount ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of 2020 (Ajeet Kumar Urf Adesh Bhati Vs. State of U. P.). (vii) Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 19423 of 2020 (Ajeet Kumar Urf Adesh Bhati Vs. State of U. P.). (viii) Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 8340 of 2020 (Pushpendra Singh Vs. State of U. P.). Shri Sayed Ali Murtaza, learned AGA argued that a prima facie case is made out against the applicant. Although he was not Director in the company floated by the main accused yet he was mediator. This fact was admitted by the applicant himself and active participation of the applicant also find support with the fact that huge amount was credited in the account of the applicant from the account of M/s. Garvit Innovative Promoters Limited. It is next contended that company was a non banking company and flouting the guidelines framed by the Reserve Bank of India Act and Companies Act, investment was offered and accepted. Number of investors i.e. more than 2.5 lakhs have invested their amount and they are still waiting for their return. It is next contended that statement made by the applicant before the Investigating Officer also finds support with the contents of the application itself. At initial stage applicant di ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Court Cases 165. 7. Kalyan Chandra Sarkar Versus Rajesh Ranjan alias Pappu Yadav and Another, (2004) 7 Supreme Court Cases 528. 8. Central Bureau of Investigation Versus Maninder Singh, (2016) 1 Supreme Court Cases 389. 9. Judgment dated 5.1.2021 passed by this Court in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application No.8606 of 2020 (Deepti Bahal Versus State of U.P.). I have considered the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the entire record including the papers submitted by the learned counsel for the parties. In this matter, as is clear from the pleading of the parties, applicant is neither the Director nor signatory nor shareholder in M/s. G.I.P.L. As per allegations some amount invested by the investors in the Bike Boat Scheme launched by M/s. G.I.P.L. was credited in the account of the applicant. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the cases, hearing the parties, going through the entire record, keeping in view the role assigned to the present applicant and also the essential ingredients of the offences levelled in the present matter as well as the orders passed in identical matters in the Ba ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of U.P.). The said order has been placed before the Court which is annexure S.A.-3 to the supplementary affidavit dated 02.11.2022. 12 . Heard Sri Atul Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant in all the matters and Sri Roopak Chaubey, learned AGA for the State and perused the records. 13 . Learned counsel for the applicant argued:- i) The applicant has been falsely implicated in the present cases. ii) The applicant belongs to a reputed family and retired from the Armed Forces on 30.11.2017 as Lanc Nayak and is an Ex-serviceman of the Army. iii) He himself is a victim of the main accused. iv) After retirement from the army, the applicant came in contact with Sanjay Bhati, one person named Sheo Dev who was also a retired army personnel and they offered to him to invest money in the company after which the applicant invested money from his post retiral benefits in the company from January 2018 almost. Since he had invested a huge amount he was nominated as an Additional Director of the company. The applicant joined the company as Additional Director on 22.08.2018 and after realising his mistake and not being satisfied with the working of the company resigned ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... cam. The copy of the said order has been placed before the Court which reads as follows:- Applications for exemption from filing official translation, from filing paper books, and permission to file additional documents are allowed. Delay condoned in Diary No(s). 27418/2022. The FIRs relating to Uttar Pradesh and New Delhi stand consolidated. We are now informed that insofar as Punjab is concerned, there is one FIR. The States of Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh are represented before us to whom notice was issued and the number of FIRs registered are possibly 36 and 5 respectively. Apart from this, FIRs are registered in the States of Gujarat, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Chhattisgarh and Himachal Pradesh. In the course of hearing, different options were explored. One prayer was to consolidate all the FIRs, but prima facie that appears difficult if there are different States and investigating agencies involved. The other suggestion was to consolidate the FIRs State-wise by moving the High Courts or by this Court. The third suggestion is that a centralized agency be entrusted with this task so that the monies can be recovered by attaching the asset ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... .11.2019. For kind perusal of this Hon ble Court copy of detail of the amount of the investors and amount transferred from GIPL in bank accounts of the applicant-accused are filed herewith and marked as Annexure CA-4 to this counter affidavit. 14. That it is submitted that during course of investigation the fact came into light that the accused applicant Pushpendra Singh purchased a plot, area 171 sq. yard, in Ananta Enclave, Walipura, District Bulandshahar in the year 2018 from Thakur Sunil Singh for consideration of Rs. 50 lacs. He constructed a house over the said plot and presently the estimated value of the said house is about 1.25 crores. The aforesaid purchase and construction was made by the accused-applicant out of the proceeds of the GIPL and the investors. The investigating officer has written a letter to the Sub-Registrar (Stamp Registration), Bulandshahar requesting him to provide copy of the sale-deed in respect of the aforesaid plot. v) It is argued that the applicant is involved in 57 like cases and investigation recently has shown him to be involved in 11 more cases. Para 15 of the said counter affidavit has been placed before the Court for the same which ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|