TMI Blog2009 (4) TMI 15X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... for the Appellant. Mr. Naveen Mullick, Adv., for the Respondent. [Judgment per : Vikramajit Sen, J.]. - CM No.8908/2008 has been filed for the restoration of the Appeal which was dismissed for non-prosecution on 25.3.2008. Learned counsel for the Respondent very fairly submitted that the Appeal may be restored. In view of the averments made in the Application it is allowed and the Appeal is restored to its original number. 2. This Appeal has been filed under Section 36G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 ('Act' for short) against the Final Order of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal passed on 2.12.2005. 3. Learned counsel for the Respondent has raised an objection at the very threshold to the effect that th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... undred rupees where such appeal is filed by the other party; (c) in the form of a memorandum of appeal precisely stating therein the substantial question of law involved. 3. Where the High Court is satisfied that a substantial question of law is involved in any case, it shall formulate that question. 4. The appeal shall be heard only on the question so formulated, and the respondents shall, at the hearing of the appeal, be allowed to argue that the case does not involve such question: Provided that nothing in this sub-section shall be deemed to take away or abridge the power of the Court to hear, for reasons to be recorded, the appeal on any other substantial question of law not formulated by it, if it is satisfied that the case inv ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ourt. - (1) The Commissioner of Central Excise or the other party may, within one hundred and eight days of the date upon which he is served with notice of an order under section 35C passed before the 1st day of July, 2003 (not being an order relating, among other things, to the determination of any question having a relation to the rate of duty of excise or to the value of goods for purposes of assessment), by application in the prescribed form, accompanied, where the application is made by the other party, by a fee of two hundred rupees, apply to the High Court to direct the Appellate Tribunal to refer to the High Court any question of law arising from such order of the Tribunal. (2) The Commissioner of Central Excise or the other part ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... done the delay in its filing. It was further observed that the period of limitation had been prescribed as six months under the old law as well as the new Act, but since the power to condone the delay had not been prescribed in the statute, the High Court was right in rejecting the appeal. Their Lordships had adverted to the earlier decision in Singh Enterprises vs. CCE, (2008) 3 SCC 70 which dealt with Section 35 of the Act. That provision stipulates that an Appeal must be filed within sixty days from the date of the communication of the decision; the proviso empowered the Commissioner(Appeals) to condone the delay if he was satisfied that the appellant had been prevented by sufficient cause from presenting the Appeal within the afores ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n both sides of the watershed-those prescribing that even the obiter dicta of the Supreme Court is binding on all other courts and those proscribing the enforcement of obiter dicta. (see Raval and Co. vs. K.G. Rama Chandran, AIR 1974 SC 818, ADM, Jabalpur vs. Shivkant Shukla, AIR 1976 SC 1207, Sreenivasa General Traders vs. State of AP , AIR 1983 SC 1246, Amar Nath Om Prakash vs. State of Punjab , AIR 1985 SC 218, ONGC vs. Western Co. of North America , AIR 1987 SC 674, MCD vs. Gurnam Kaur , AIR 1989 SC 38, Sanjay Dutt vs. State through CBI, Bombay , (1994) 5 SCC 402, Director of Settlements, AP vs. M.R. Appa Rao , AIR 2002 SC 1598, Nathi Devi vs. Radha Devi Gupta , (2005) 2 SCC 271, State of Haryana vs. Ranbi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
