Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2023 (7) TMI 255

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... o the statement given under Section 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1994 by the present appellants have come on record. Therefore, both the present appellants have direct involvement in passing of fraudulent Cenvat credit to M/s Nakoda Alloys Pvt. Ltd. The penalty was imposed under Rule 26(2) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 which has come into force with effect from 01.04.2007. Therefore, for all the transactions made prior to 01.04.2007 the Penal Provision Rule 26(2) cannot be applied retrospectively. Therefore, in respect of the transactions only made after 01.04.2007 the penalty under Rule 26(2) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 shall be applicable. In this case no penalty can be imposed under Rule 26(2) of Central Excise Rules, 2002. As r .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 127(6) of Chapter V of Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019. 2.1 He further submits that the penalty was imposed under Rule 26(2) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 whereas this Rule came into force only from 01-04-2007. Therefore, for the transaction pertains to the period prior to 01.04.2007 no penalty can be imposed. He placed reliance on the following judgments: Commissioner of C. Ex. Chandigarh Vs. Anshul Steel Scrap Corpn. 2011(264) E.L.T. 535 (Tri.- Del.) Dhakad Metal Corporation Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex. S.T. Daman 2015(330) E.L.T. 561 (Tri.- Ahmd.) Duggar fiber Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex. S.T., Delhi 2015(322) E. L.T. 763 (Tri. Del.) Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh-I Vs. Mini Steel Traderds 2014 (30 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... xcise Act, 1994 by the present appellants have come on record. Therefore, I am of the view that both the present appellants have direct involvement in passing of fraudulent Cenvat credit to M/s Nakoda Alloys Pvt. Ltd. 4.3 Having observed as above I also found that penalty was imposed under Rule 26(2) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 which has come into force with effect from 01.04.2007. Therefore, in my considered view for all the transactions made prior to 01.04.2007 the Penal Provision Rule 26(2) cannot be applied retrospectively. Therefore, in respect of the transactions only made after 01.04.2007 the penalty under Rule 26(2) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 shall be applicable. This issue has been considered in the judgments cited by Learn .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates