Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2023 (7) TMI 744

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the following grounds of appeal before us: "1. The ld. Assessing Officer erred in law as well as in fact while making an addition of Rs. 10,01,500.00 on account of cash deposit in bank. Further, the first Appellate Authority (CIT, Appeals) also erred in law by sustaining the addition made by the A.O, the same is bad in law and is liable to be deleted. 2. The appellant reserves the right to add, amend, or alter any ground or grounds at the time of hearing." Also the assessee has raised additional grounds of appeal which reads as under: "Additional Ground No.1 1. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, notice u/s. 148 dt. 30-3-17 issued by ITO-4(3), Raipur; reassessment made u/s. 147 r.w.s 144 by ITO-4(5), Raipur dt.1 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of appeal raised by the assessee company before us involves questions of law based on the facts available on record, therefore, the same are admitted by relying on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of National Thermal Power Company Ltd. Ltd. Vs. CIT (1998) 229 ITR 383 (SC). 2. Succinctly stated, the case of the assessee was reopened by the A.O vide notice issued u/s. 148 of the Act dated 30.03.2017 for the reason that though the cash deposits of Rs. 20.03 lacs were made by the assessee in his bank account with Axis Bank Ltd., Branch : Opp. New Jeevan Bima Marg, Pandri, Raipur but no return of income was filed by him. 3. During the course of assessment proceedings, it was observed by the A.O that as the assessee had fai .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ash amounting to Rs. 20.03 lacs was deposited in his bank account but the same was factually incorrect. Carrying his contention further, it was submitted by the Ld. AR that the assessee during the year under consideration had made cash deposits of Rs. 10,01,500/- in her bank account. On the basis of the aforesaid facts, it was the claim of the Ld. AR that now when the very basis for initiation of proceedings u/s. 147 of the Act was factually incorrect, therefore, neither the "reasons to believe" nor approval granted by the Pr. CIT u/s. 151(1) of the Act without application of mind could be sustained. 9. On merits, the Ld. AR had come forth with two-fold contentions, viz. (i) that the assessee who had got married during the year under consi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... bank account, therefore, we are of the considered view that there were sufficient reasons with him to arrive at a bonafide belief on the basis of material available on record that the income of the assessee who had not filed her return of income for the year under consideration had escaped assessment u/s. 147 of the Act. 13. In so far the reliance placed by the Ld. AR on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Officer & Ors (1999) 236 ITR34 (SC), the same is not only found to be distinguishable on facts but in fact supports the validity of the reopening of the case of the present assessee before us. As observed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. Vs .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... by the assessee are dismissed in terms of our aforesaid observations. 14. Apropos the merits of the case, it was the claim of the Ld. AR that the cash deposits in the bank account of the assessee were sourced out of the withdrawals made by her from the amount of "Meher" which was received by her at the time of her marriage and was credited in her bank account; as well as out of the personal savings that were accumulated by her over the years. As the assessee had neither before the lower authorities nor before us been able to successfully establish that the cash withdrawals made from her bank account were utilized for redepositing the same, therefore, her said claim cannot be fully accepted. Apart from that, a perusal of the bank account of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates