TMI Blog2021 (7) TMI 1418X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Appellate Tribunal CESTAT was filed within limitation. In the circumstances, the delay would have to be condoned. Similarly, for the same reason, the delay on the part of Infosys Limited in filing its appeals against the judgment of CESTAT in M/S INFOSYS LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S INFOSYS TECHNOLOGIES LTD.) VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, - BANGALORE, [ 2014 (3) TMI 695 - CESTAT BANGALORE] ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... respondent (infosys Limited) to the first of the two appeals listed before us. Two Central Excise Appeals were filed before the High Court, Central Excise Appeal No 45 of 2014 by the Infosys Limited and Central Excise Appeal No 47 of 2014 by the Commissioner of Service Tax. Among the issues raised in the appeals were issues pertaining to the liability to CENVAT as well as taxability. The High Cour ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... other appeals as well, namely, Civil Appeal No 8204 of 2016 and 4437-4440 of 2018. 7 In the above circumstances, the appeals are admitted. 8 Tag with Civil Appeal No 5602 of 2015. 9 The Additional Solicitor General and Mr K S Ravi Shankar accept notice for the respondents in the two respective appeals. 10 Counter affidavit, if any, be filed within six weeks from today. - - TaxTMI ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
