Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2023 (8) TMI 1092

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 2 (Appeals - 4), Ghaziabad by which the appeal of the petitioner has been dismissed on the ground of limitation. 4. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is a registered dealer and deals with the business of iron & steel. On 18.03.2018, while the goods were transported, the respondent no. 3 intercepted the goods and found that e-way bill - 01 was not available with documents and consequently detained the goods and a notice was issued under section 129(3) of the UPGST Act directing the petitioner to deposit the tax & penalty. Aggrieved against the order dated 18.03.2018, the petitioner filed Writ Tax No. 500/2018, in which vide order dated 28.03.2018, an interim order was passed releasing the goods of the petitioner, along wit .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d person, for the first came to know about the order dated 28.03.2018 on 26.06.2019 and therefore, the appeal was within limitation. He further submits that in section 169 of the UP GST Act, various modes of service have been prescribed. The authorities were duty-bound to first serve the copy of the order upon the aggrieved person, i.e., the petitioner, and not upon his earlier counsel. He further submits that section 107 of the UP GST Act is to be read in consonance with section 169 of the UP GST Act, but the authorities have not consider the said aspect of the matter that the date of communication, as referred in section 107 of the UP GST Act, is the date when, for the first time, the petitioner came to know about the impugned order and b .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... der has rightly been passed rejecting the appeal beyond the period of limitation. He prays for dismissal of the writ petition. 8. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, the Court has perused the records. 9. For appreciating the controversy in hand, the relevant provisions of sections 107 (1) and 169 of the UP GST Act are quoted below:- Section 107. Appeals to Appellate Authority: (1) Any person aggrieved by any decision or order passed under this Act or the State Goods and Services Tax Act or the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act by an adjudicating authority may appeal to such Appellate Authority as may be prescribed within three months from the date on which the said decision or order is communicated to such pers .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ce board of the office of the concerned officer or authority who or which passed such decision or order or issued such summons or notice. (2) Every decision, order, summons, notice or any communication shall be deemed to have been served on the date on which it is tendered or published or a copy thereof is affixed in the manner provided in sub-section (1). (3) When such decision, order, summons, notice or any communication is sent by registered post or speed post, it shall be deemed to have been received by the addressee at the expiry of the period normally taken by such post in transit unless the contrary is proved. 10. From the perusal of the aforesaid provisions, it is evidently clear that the appeal against an order can be preferre .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t any communication or any reference about the knowledge of the order dated 28.03.2018 being passed, the certified copy of the order was applied and on the same day, the appeal was preferred. On perusal of section 5 application of the petitioner filed in support of the appeal, not a single word has been whispered as to how and in what method the petitioner came to know about the said order on 26.06.2019 and as to why the application was moved on 26.06.2019 by another counsel, when the order dated 28.03.2018 was already communicated to the petitioner's Advocate, namely, Shri Anil Jain. Once the Advocate, namely, Shri Anil Jain, was representing the petitioner before the respondent - Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Mobile Squad, on whi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates