9911796707
TMI Blog2023 (9) TMI 332X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n, Advocates. For the Respondents Through: Mr Vipul Agrawal, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr Gibran Naushad and Ms Shakshi Shairwal, Standing Counsel. RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.: (ORAL) CM APPL. 42388/2023 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 10939/2023 and CM APPL. 42387/2023 [Application filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking interim relief] 2. Issue notice. 3. Mr Vipul Agrawal, l ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... deduction under Section 35(2AB) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short, "the Act"], vis-a-vis expenditure incurred on research and development. 8. Concededly, the petitioner, in the AY in issue, i.e., AY 2021-22, was allowed to claim a deduction at the rate of 100% of the expenditure incurred. However, it ended up claiming deduction at the rate of 200%. 9. According to the petitioner, this was a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... regard to the fact that personal hearing was not granted, we are inclined to set aside the impugned order and the consequential notice. 12.1 It is ordered accordingly. 12.2 Liberty is, however, given to the Assessing Officer (AO) to pass a fresh order after according personal hearing to the authorized representative of the petitioner. 12.3 For this purpose, the AO will issue a notice to the pet ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
