9911796707
TMI Blog2022 (5) TMI 1580X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 482 Cr.P.C, is granting of an anticipatory bail, vide order dated 13th March, 2020, by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi, to the respondents/accused. 3. It may be mentioned here that the case was registered on the allegations that the accused/respondents had entered into a criminal conspiracy to cheat the petitioner/complainant of valuable property. It is the case of the petitioner/complainant that he and the respondent No. 1/accused No. 1 were college friends and had entered into a registered Partnership Deed dated 10th April, 2014 for manufacturing remote controls under the name and style of M/s. S.S. Manufacturing. Both partners had invested money in the firm. Subsequently, in December, 2015, the pet ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... mount and (viii) there was sufficient material on record to suggest that the respondents/accused would tamper with the evidence. 5. Status Report has been filed by the Investigating Officer setting out that the respondent No. 1/accused No. 1 was not cooperative during investigations as he has threatened the Chartered Accountant. Custodial interrogation was also required for recovery of misappropriated goods, material and machinery, original copy of the forged documents/Rent Agreement, confrontation of the respondents/accused with the witnesses and for recovery of testing equipments, computers and software essential for manufacturing of remotes and to unearth the role of everyone involved in this conspiracy. 6. In the reply filed by the re ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t the petition ought to be dismissed. 8. As has been held by the Supreme Court in Hazari Lal Das (supra), following the judgment of the Supreme Court in Dolat Ram Vs. State of Haryana (1995) 1 SCC 349, once bail is granted, very cogent and overwhelming circumstances are necessary for an order directing its cancellation. The one seeking cancellation of the bail must show an interference by the accused or attempt to so interfere, with the due course of administration of justice or an evasion or attempt to evade the due course of justice or an abuse of the concession granted to the accused in any manner. It is clear, in the present case, the petitioner/complainant has not been able to establish any of these factors, even on a prima facie view ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
